Forum	Title	Content	Member	Sex	Country	Date/Time
China	Speaking of updating status...	Something I've been a little curious about for the past few months, is what exactly is it they use at CIS/NVC to determine to use either GUZ or GZO methods? Draw A#'s from a hat? Being a human, my mind can't help but wonder if there is a deeper, more sinister reasoning for this. In all likeliness, there isn't- it probably really does involve a pack of Budweiser and a hat. That's why I haven't asked this question earlier. But while we're discussing outcomes and results- particularly at GZ- can anyone offer recent input on this? I notice GZO numbers fly through USCIS and NVC, and only go even faster at the consulate with only a few questions, and sometimes even no questions, asked. Could it be possible that GUZ numbers and GZO numbers are not created equally? What are some recent outcomes from those that had the consulate delay period of a few months (GUZ number of course) come interview day? Easy? Hard? White? In a nutshell: is there likely any different outcome one could predict depending on the number they have? Edited by Moonandstar, 19 April 2010 - 12:01 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-04-19 11:57:00
China	interview class at embassy	Hey - any news? She have interview ? any status? No update on his timeline.... but they did already post a review: Wow, worry, worry, worry, for nothing. We had everything, skype records, email, phone, financial, many photos over the entire period of our relationship. I wrote a letter for myself, and sent it as a supporting document. We have been sweating this for almost a year, and when she went in, it was so straight forward, and the man was very good, it went very easily. I think that they look very heavily at how many times you have come to China, and wether or not you are at the interview with your fiance, and then compare it to the photos. The man didn't even look at anything but the financial documents. I was very worried about her English, but with out even asking, he conducted the interview in Chinese, and asked just the basic questions, what is your fiances name, how did you meet, and a couple other easy ones. Like I said, I really think that they go by intuition, and how many times you go to China. We are so happy, and are looking forward to being together forever. The only thing that I didn't like, was that she came out saying how nice the man was, and how handsome, I think she actually said, very handsome, grrrrr lol. It's a good thing she laughed, and kissed me on the neck after she said it. Anyway, good luck, don't sweat it if you really love each other, it will be fine. Peace Oh by the way, if you are at the interview, don't forget to give her your passport to take with her. I think its funny how he then rated it "very poor" XD	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-04-21 02:59:00
China	Resume for K-1?	A resume is only ever asked for when the beneficiary is possible ccp. I have never heard of a resume being asked for outside of that. G325a + Ds-230 already covers more than most resumes do anyway. We had a resume for both of us prepared.... was never looked at. No good reason not to take the time to prepare one, IMO, but dont expect them to ask for it at the interview. Edited by Moonandstar, 09 July 2010 - 06:04 AM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-07-09 06:01:00
National Visa Center (Dept of State)	STUCK @ NVC for AP	Any room left for me to join the AP party? For those in AP @ NVC there is a bright light at the end of AP... I just did some digging and looked back at those that went through AP when I did... I only see 1 filer to date that has had a problem.... everyone that has interviewed aside from 1 has been granted the visa... and 1 person did not even have to interview... they just said hi you are approved, no need for interview... so AP may delay things but it may be a good thing... Wow, that is a nice bright light! Do you remember how many cases total that you looked at? And what time frame did this cover? O yea, and was this just for a few consulates, or was this global? Edited by Moonandstar, 04 January 2010 - 08:52 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-01-04 20:50:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	Cosponsored I-134	QUOTE (MMarc @ Dec 8 2009, 11:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> We just had our interview on Oct. 27th and I had last year 2008 taxes for my co-sponsor (this was not enough). We ended up with a BLUE SLIP requesting "THREE YEARS CERTIFIED COPIES" from my co-sponsor. Since, you are unemployed and a recent graduate, not having worked much during the past couple of years, I would suggest do not even take the chance of having them request more information. Order the certified tax forms now (IRS for 4506) their will be a 60 day processing time for this and their is nothing you can do about it. I went to the IRS office and tried every thing to get them to expedite the CERTIFIED COPIES but they stated, it is what it is. I am still waiting 39 DAYS so far and I have nothing. Good luck MMarc- Thanks for the reply! I've noticed your other posts, and i've read your review of the consulate in the past- after that, i knew it was going to be 3 years worth for me (or at least my joint sponsor)! I was hoping to save money on this process, but you might be right..... But from what i've seen, GUZ tends only to ask for certified copies on a blue slip IF there was already something else the interviewer was lacking- such as 3 years worth of transcripts- I dont think i've ever seen a case where someone was denied SOLELY for not having their transcripts certified..... Can any of the long-timers here confirm this? Also, i've heard that GUZ tends to discriminate a bit against 134's that don't qualify with income........ Can i get a little more feedback on this?	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-08 13:17:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	Cosponsored I-134	"Please submit an IRS-certified copy of your co-sponsor's tax returns for the 3 most recent tax years. A person obtains an IRS-certified copy by submitting IRS Form 4506, and paying the requisite filing fee." I was going over some CFL posts from ages past (07), and noticed one person posted their blue, that mentioned this. Later, when i submit my 134, i know ill need a cosponsor, and i have only a vague understanding of whats needed (and I DONT want a blue!), so, if i use a cosponsor that will likely qualify under assets, what tax info is needed from him? 3 years transcripts? or do they really need the certified (and therefore COSTLY) returns- or both?? Opinions from people with experience with GUZ are particularly helpful.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-06 11:06:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	i-134 for cosponsor	I would state it, unless the form was'nt kept or copied by the place they used it at. For example, i filled out one when my fiancee interviewed for a tourist visa, but she was denied, and it was returned to her, so later it makes sense for me to put 'none'. One extra tid bit, if it was sent back after an interview, then they probably have it on file, and so he should state he has previously filled one out. It wont hurt his 134's credibility for saying so. Edited by Moonandstar, 12 December 2009 - 04:49 AM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-12 04:45:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	Do Tourist Visa's Freak You Out?	QUOTE (TBoneTX @ Dec 26 2009, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This grandiose pronouncement is naive, elitist, snooty, 100% offensive, and completely inappropriate to state here. (If you wish to convince others otherwise, good luck in having the slightest success.) Perhaps I am not alone in the thought that certain overly prolific posters should avoid "diarrhea of the keyboard" that speaks volumes about themselves... all negative. Agreed. QUOTE That's why I recommend before getting married on a K1 to try and visit on a tourist visa first, you should think twice about marrying someone the US embassy would not even allow into the country as a visitor! What my country says does not affect me. I make my country, not the other way around. Since you made a suggestion to me: i would suggest that you do the same.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-26 15:53:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K1 Visa Interivew fee	Thank you guys. I'll have her have some "extra" cash just in case. Do you think it would help if I fly to be with her at the interview? or would that be too much and redundant? Being from afghanistan, and from what i hear, (correct me if i'm wrong) you can expect her to get a blue, at best. If you have the money to spare, i would reccomend being there for her.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-01-14 21:06:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	Filing tax returns without meeting the minimum income	Oh ok, i get it now. THanks for the help guys.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-02-02 16:38:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	Filing tax returns without meeting the minimum income	Right i realize they aren't supposed to file for me, i was saying that they were supposed to withhold all taxes for me. I know im not required, but i would like to anyway- i think you answered my question, but just for clarity, IF i file, and fill in 171 as the taxes due, I wont end up with a bill, will i?	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-02-02 01:56:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	Filing tax returns without meeting the minimum income	I know this isn't really the place for tax questions, but the only reason i'm filing is because of the visa. I only made $1700 in 2008. Wayyy below the minimum income filing requirements. This was all working the same job, and they withheld income tax for me. $37 to be exact. But going over the 2008 tax tables, it says that for that income amount, i would owe $171 in taxes. So my question is, if i file income tax for 2008, does that mean i would need to pay them $134?? Even though i'm not required to file for that year? I thought the place i was working for was supposed to handle that for me....	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-02-02 00:32:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K1 visa revoked, but...	Awesome!!! 'Bout time! And congrats!	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-01-30 01:45:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K1 visa revoked, but...	O god i've had this topic on my favorites and thought this must have disappeared into history... Good to have an update...... Bad they don't have an update.... You know i had my NOA1 3 days before your OP............ I'll race to to their finish line! And	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 22:03:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	I forget where, but i think i read somewhere it will go into effect March 1.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-02-01 23:02:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	I think it's important to note that there is really no one "they" out there considering the total costs of fiance or spouse immigration. USCIS is a fee based, not tax supported agency. They set fees for their services without regard for what the Dept. of State sets as fees to process visa applications. Processing a K visa application is more complicated and time consuming than processing a B visa, so DOS is attempting to reflect that in new fees. We don't have to like it but it's important to understand the facts instead of railing against some non-existent "they". Yes that's a good point, and i realize that, but my argument is to try to get them to start looking at the total cost, for immigration's sake. You would think that tax dollars would be enough.... Edited by Moonandstar, 06 January 2010 - 01:34 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-01-06 13:33:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	I was just about to say the same thing: here's a look from my comment that they responded to Jan 4: A little different by the looks of em'. Thank you for your comment. Please note that the proposed fees apply to nonimmigrant visa services, not immigrant visas. Spouses, children and parents applying for immigrant visas to the United States currently pay the Department of State a $355 application processing fee as well as a $45 immigrant visa security surcharge (items 32 and 36 on the Schedule of Fees). These fees are in addition to petition fees paid by the U.S. citizen relative to the Department of Homeland Security. The proposed rule would increase the fee for K-category fiancé(e) visas; these visas are technically nonimmigrant visas, although the applicant is expected to marry and convert status within 90 days of entering the United States. The rule proposes raising fees associated with K visas from $131 to $350, specifically because the processing required for such a visa is much closer to an immigrant visa than to most visitor visas. Adjudicating a K visa requires a review of extensive documentation and a more in-depth interview of the applicant than other categories of machine-readable visas (MRVs). The Department has concluded that it would be more equitable to those applying those other categories of MRVs, for which such extensive review is not necessary, to establish separate fees that more accurately reflect the cost of processing these visas. Therefore, this rule establishes fees for these categories corresponding to projected cost figures for the visa category as determined by the most recent Cost of Service Study. Please be assured that the Department is proposing to increase the fees in question because the actual costs of providing these services have increased since the last Cost of Service Study (2004). I hope this clarifies the issue and addresses your concerns. And for what it's worth, my response: Yes, i understand that the department may find the K visa fees at the consular level a bit low, but the emphasis of what I'm saying is that K visa applicants already have too many fees that must be paid, that are pricing many of us out of immigration. When you look at immigrat visas, on the other hand, they get to skip the USCIS's $1000+ AOS fee later on. Making them more affordable than the K class non-immigrant visas- regardless of a higher MRV processing fee. I would hope that the Department realize that it may be more economically 'wise' to keep these overall prices on visas lower, so that in turn, there are more immigrants inbound the USA, which in turn means more taxes paid, and in the long run: more money earned. Especially concerning the already most-expensive visa categories- when totaling the end cost to the applicants- rather than just the DOS' internal prices. Edited by Moonandstar, 06 January 2010 - 02:04 AM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-01-06 02:02:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (Copperblade @ Dec 27 2009, 08:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> How does that work? Is that different than K-1? Yes, if you're married, and have been living with your wife in her country for the most recent 6 months, then you are eligible to 'skip' the CIS part and just file with the embassy. Shows you just how important the CIS part is. (for them to make money, that is ) QUOTE (Copperblade @ Dec 27 2009, 08:32 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Is there an alternative (cheaper) way to get permanent residence than filing the AOS? Yes- get married and do a CR/IR-1. No AOS for that.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-27 21:11:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (Filipina Lover @ Dec 19 2009, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That really makes me mad, that is totally uncalled for. That is saying they hate Americans marrying foreigners and they are going hurt us. Just look at the fees already, when I did this years ago, it was under $1000 for everything, now it's over $3000 and they want to raise it more. This is no different than the mafia going door to door to businesses and telling them to pay up if they want protection. How about a reduction in pay for them, how about we reduce their pay by 50%, since America is broke, they need to do their part and help out. It's supposed to be we the people and they work for us and then they do this back to us, their boss. Can we complain as citizens, because the form say something about selecting a government agency and type and I don't know what to put. I just hope I can get through this before the increase happens, but it's not fair to others. == QUOTE (Jay & Beverly @ Dec 18 2009, 04:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Here is what I did. Go to the following website (http://www.regulations.gov/index.cfm) and enter "RIN 1400-AC57" in the search box. At the bottom of the next screen you'll see 2 documents found. At the far right line for the document "Schedule of Fees for Consular Services..." there is a little link to "Submit Comments". Regardless of your citizenship, you can make comments. I recommend *BOTH* the US Citizen and their proposed Fiance/Fiancee make comments. It is very important in the fields for "Government Agency Type" and "Government Agency" that you select "Federal" and "Department of State" respectively. Below is the exact comment I left on that site and also on the website for the Senators and Representatives of my state. Feel free to use it entirely or as a basis for your own comment but please change your name, state, and citizenship at the bottom. ** Make sure to reference "RIN (1400-AC57)" in the subject line!!! ** Subj: RIN: 1400-AC57 I'm writing in opposition of the proposed increase in fees, in particular the K-type visa. The current fee rate of $131 to the proposed fee rate of $350 is a $229 which represents an unbelievable 167% increase in fees. A similar 198% is being applied to the E-type visas. These 2 types represent 79,811 applications based on FY2009 actuals. With respect to all the other proposed rate fees for visas contained in RIN: 1400-AC57, (visa types: H, P, L, O, Q, R) a $19 increase representing a 15% increase of fee is being proposed. The non-petitioned based visas (except E-types) despite having the largest volume of applications (5,499,494 based on FY2009 actuals) will be increased from the current fee of $131 dollars to the proposed fee of $140 which represents a $9 or 7% increase in fees. I am opposed to this rate increase specifically because it unfairly imposes a more than double the current rate fee increase on a much smaller group of applicants. I feel it is a highly unfair and inequitable practice to propose such an fee increase on a community of applicants that represent only 1/7th of all visa applications. Respectfully, Jason E. Dxxxxxx United States Veteran Resident of the Great State of Oregon United States Citizen	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-19 07:59:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (Tsaria @ Dec 18 2009, 06:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Just reading through this quickly...it makes me very irrate about the fee increases and tomorrow first thing I am writing to submit my opinion to those lovely people in charge. But I find it very fascinating that this is going all while at the same time a major issue for 2010 will be proposed amnesty legislation for illegal aliens. Now the purpose of me mentioning it is not to raise a political debate on whether or not mexican citizens should get this. My opinion is very simple, we all should have to go about this in the same manner. Painful as it maybe. But why should all those people who skipped by the rules get citizenship free and clear, while the rest of us pay and pay and pay. It's such a frustrating situation. here is the link to an article on the topic. again, please ignore the political nature. I only provide the link as a reference to the proposed legislation. Amnesty Proposal for illegal aliens Yea i've seen more about the bill that's part of. I think its more than a mere coincidence that this is coming up at the same time as that.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 17:47:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (SMR @ Dec 18 2009, 05:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> QUOTE (Moonandstar @ Dec 17 2009, 08:58 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> QUOTE (CaMic @ Dec 17 2009, 07:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I didn't read the whole article - my brain just couldn't process it just now - but is there a justification as to why K class visas are increasing so much more than other classes? I agree that the AOS fee is more worrysome, if that increases by 167% then OMG!! I knew that there were fee increases pending, but I wholeheartedly assumed it would simply be in line with inflation. Here's their 'logic' for the K visa: [[Page 66078]] In addition, the 2007-2009 CoSS found that the cost of accepting, adjudicating, and issuing MRV applications for the following categories of visas is appreciably higher than for other categories: E (treaty- trader or treaty-investor); H (temporary workers and trainees); K (fianc[eacute](e)s and certain spouses of U.S. citizens); L (intracompany transferee); O (aliens with extraordinary ability); P (athletes, artists, and entertainers); Q (international cultural exchange visitors) and R (aliens in religious occupations). Each of these visa categories requires a review of extensive documentation and a more in-depth interview of the applicant than BCCs and other categories of MRVs. The Department has concluded that it would be more equitable to those applying for BCCs and other categories of MRVs, for which such extensive review is not necessary, to establish separate fees that more accurately reflect the cost of processing these visas. Therefore, this rule establishes the following fees for these categories corresponding to projected cost figures for the visa category as determined by the CoSS and incorporating the $1 Wilberforce surcharge (see Wilberforce Act, Public Law 110-457, Title II, Sec. 239(a) (surcharge applies to all nonimmigrant MRVs)): H, L, O, P, Q and R: $150. E: $390. K: $350. But i would argue that the "additional processing" should be done at the USCIS. Otherwise, what are we paying them for? And besides, K visa interviews generally last only minutes longer than B visa interviews, from what i see. QUOTE (CaMic @ Dec 17 2009, 07:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Does anyone have and idea of what type of comments we should make in the email we send and is it only the USC whom can comment since it's a US government issue? I think that as many people can make comments about this should. There's no requirement on the page asking for a SSN or passport number. I think if you are a USC, then it might help to mention that. When i wrote my comment, i mentioned that i was currently waiting on my I-129F at VSC. Yes, but a K-visa already costs an extra $455 compared to a B-visa. A B visa costs $131 and that's it. Exactly!	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 16:44:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (Jay & Beverly @ Dec 18 2009, 05:30 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> QUOTE (Moonandstar @ Dec 17 2009, 01:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Good advice. But i would think it might also help to mention to them that this process is already extortion for us, and that K visa applicants already have enough fees on hand, No? I hope you were only joking about mentioning extortion. Although I can empathize with the feeling, I don't see how that could possibly be a helpful comment to leave. Well, i don't mean you should put it the way i did! But when i left my comment, i pointed out that the K visa is already the most expensive marriage-based visa, especially seeing as we have to meet a $1000+ AOS fee upon arrival. In my opinion, if the DOS needs more money to process K visas, that's where it should come out of. (Not that it should be a higher AOS fee, mind you, just that DOS should be asking for half of that check, rather than a new one.)	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 16:42:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (Jay & Beverly @ Dec 18 2009, 04:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Here is what I did. Go to the following website (http://www.regulations.gov/index.cfm) and enter "RIN 1400-AC57" in the search box. At the bottom of the next screen you'll see 2 documents found. At the far right line for the document "Schedule of Fees for Consular Services..." there is a little link to "Submit Comments". Regardless of your citizenship, you can make comments. I recommend *BOTH* the US Citizen and their proposed Fiance/Fiancee make comments. It is very important in the fields for "Government Agency Type" and "Government Agency" that you select "Federal" and "Department of State" respectively. Below is the exact comment I left on that site and also on the website for the Senators and Representatives of my state. Feel free to use it entirely or as a basis for your own comment but please change your name, state, and citizenship at the bottom. ** Make sure to reference "RIN (1400-AC57)" in the subject line!!! ** Subj: RIN: 1400-AC57 I'm writing in opposition of the proposed increase in fees, in particular the K-type visa. The current fee rate of $131 to the proposed fee rate of $350 is a $229 which represents an unbelievable 167% increase in fees. A similar 198% is being applied to the E-type visas. These 2 types represent 79,811 applications based on FY2009 actuals. With respect to all the other proposed rate fees for visas contained in RIN: 1400-AC57, (visa types: H, P, L, O, Q, R) a $19 increase representing a 15% increase of fee is being proposed. The non-petitioned based visas (except E-types) despite having the largest volume of applications (5,499,494 based on FY2009 actuals) will be increased from the current fee of $131 dollars to the proposed fee of $140 which represents a $9 or 7% increase in fees. I am opposed to this rate increase specifically because it unfairly imposes a more than double the current rate fee increase on a much smaller group of applicants. I feel it is a highly unfair and inequitable practice to propose such an fee increase on a community of applicants that represent only 1/7th of all visa applications. Respectfully, Jason E. Dxxxxxx United States Veteran Resident of the Great State of Oregon United States Citizen Good advice. But i would think it might also help to mention to them that this process is already extortion for us, and that K visa applicants already have enough fees on hand, No?	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 16:04:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (rebeccajo @ Dec 18 2009, 02:14 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> QUOTE (Moonandstar @ Dec 17 2009, 12:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> QUOTE (rebeccajo @ Dec 18 2009, 12:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> http://www.chron.com...on/6719789.html Bear in mind that USCIS cannot just unilaterally implement a fee increase. Congress must approve one. That is why the process takes some time. Thats true- but the bad news is, this isn't USCIS. This is DOS. From my understanding (correct me if i'm wrong), they can just wake up on the wrong side of the bed one day and decide to start charging $500 for all visas if they want. Yes, I understand that the original topic is regarding a DOS fee increase. And I can't say what their policy is because I really have no idea. My comment wasn't regarding that. It was directed towards the side-discussion that has ensued regarding potential increases from the Service. Ah, gotcha.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 16:00:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (rebeccajo @ Dec 18 2009, 12:02 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> http://www.chron.com...on/6719789.html Bear in mind that USCIS cannot just unilaterally implement a fee increase. Congress must approve one. That is why the process takes some time. Thats true- but the bad news is, this isn't USCIS. This is DOS. From my understanding (correct me if i'm wrong), they can just wake up on the wrong side of the bed one day and decide to start charging $500 for all visas if they want.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 12:07:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (CaMic @ Dec 17 2009, 07:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I didn't read the whole article - my brain just couldn't process it just now - but is there a justification as to why K class visas are increasing so much more than other classes? I agree that the AOS fee is more worrysome, if that increases by 167% then OMG!! I knew that there were fee increases pending, but I wholeheartedly assumed it would simply be in line with inflation. Here's their 'logic' for the K visa: [[Page 66078]] In addition, the 2007-2009 CoSS found that the cost of accepting, adjudicating, and issuing MRV applications for the following categories of visas is appreciably higher than for other categories: E (treaty- trader or treaty-investor); H (temporary workers and trainees); K (fianc[eacute](e)s and certain spouses of U.S. citizens); L (intracompany transferee); O (aliens with extraordinary ability); P (athletes, artists, and entertainers); Q (international cultural exchange visitors) and R (aliens in religious occupations). Each of these visa categories requires a review of extensive documentation and a more in-depth interview of the applicant than BCCs and other categories of MRVs. The Department has concluded that it would be more equitable to those applying for BCCs and other categories of MRVs, for which such extensive review is not necessary, to establish separate fees that more accurately reflect the cost of processing these visas. Therefore, this rule establishes the following fees for these categories corresponding to projected cost figures for the visa category as determined by the CoSS and incorporating the $1 Wilberforce surcharge (see Wilberforce Act, Public Law 110-457, Title II, Sec. 239(a) (surcharge applies to all nonimmigrant MRVs)): H, L, O, P, Q and R: $150. E: $390. K: $350. But i would argue that the "additional processing" should be done at the USCIS. Otherwise, what are we paying them for? And besides, K visa interviews generally last only minutes longer than B visa interviews, from what i see. QUOTE (CaMic @ Dec 17 2009, 07:21 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Does anyone have and idea of what type of comments we should make in the email we send and is it only the USC whom can comment since it's a US government issue? I think that as many people can make comments about this should. There's no requirement on the page asking for a SSN or passport number. I think if you are a USC, then it might help to mention that. When i wrote my comment, i mentioned that i was currently waiting on my I-129F at VSC.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-17 11:58:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	Thanks for the support guys! keep it comin! And let friends and family- particularly those in this process or those that have been or will go through this process know, and what they can do about it- February is the deadline.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 21:55:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	Thanks for the help Jay! The best part about US law, is that even though it may be a dim chance, it doesn't prevent us from trying to make it how it should be. By the way, that link at the bottom of your post seems to be broken.... And i take back my earlier words: i would have done DCF if i could have- but can't because im one of those unfortunate people that fall through all the cracks of international law- in China, i need to be 23 to marry, so for me, a K-1 is my ONLY resort. Edited by Moonandstar, 16 December 2009 - 05:56 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 17:53:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	QUOTE (1HappyGuy @ Dec 17 2009, 06:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> so maybe they are paying the embassy staff a little too much. From all the refusals i see from good folks here: My thoughts exactly.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 17:27:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	Thanks rsn! Was hopin that K-3r's would see this too! QUOTE (Gary and Alla @ Dec 17 2009, 06:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, and I have it on good authority you can expect 50-100% increases on ALL fees in the next year or less...petitions, AOS, everything. The fees will not be grandfathered at all, meaning you may begin the priocess with the lower fee and end up paying the higher fee before it is over (for the visa or AOS for example) True that. I heard it was comin but i was under the impression it only applied to CIS procedures, and that i was out of the blue, at least til AOS. But let me say again: SHARE YOUR OPINIONS WITH THEM!! IT IS A PENDING RULE, and therefore can still be smacked down, if we're lucky and can show overwhelming nonsupport for this!!! Edited by Moonandstar, 16 December 2009 - 05:23 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 17:22:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	That wouldn't be so bad- but check the first link- for most visas it goes to 140, but for us we get the full 350...... Edit: ya beat me to it Edited by Moonandstar, 16 December 2009 - 04:54 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 16:53:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K VISA FEE TO INCREASE TO $350 FROM $131	http://guangzhou.use...e-increase.html The full article: http://www.regulatio...900006480a6a10b What really pisses me off, is that from what i can see, for those of us that have already started this process- but not interviewed yet- we're havin a fast one pulled on us by DOS! If i had known it was gonna be 167% more expensive come the interview, i would have just ###### myself and gotten married and done DCF! #### THIS! Tell them this is bullshit, and if nothing else, allow those of us that already thought we would be coughing us $131 at interview the original price! LET THEM KNOW THIS IS WRONG, and if this were a law that affected the average American's life IT would most certainly be given a grace period of some sort. Refer to the first link for contact info. THIS APPLIES TO ALL EMBASSIES AND CONSULATES- NOT JUST CHINA.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-12-16 16:45:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K1 Interview Countdown	Don't forget to tell your girl good luck today!	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-03-22 12:01:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	China Embassy in the Philippines	O yea, and her 'employer' tricked her- sounds like a real b!tch: in China, only government-certified Chinese corporations can hire employees legally (therefore getting a work visa). Since her 'employer' was neither a Chinese business, nor was the purpose of her employment for scientific research or teaching, it was never a realistic possibility in the first place. Although macau could be a little different. Not sure about that tho. Again, likely depends on what visa she had to get to go there in the first place. Edited by Moonandstar, 20 July 2010 - 10:31 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-07-20 22:28:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	China Embassy in the Philippines	Oh that sucks. So she over stayed in china huh? Macau right? What kind of visa did she get for that, regular Chinese visa? Or some kind of special macau thing? How long did she overstay, and what reaction did she get from the immigrations on her way back to the phil? I ask because it may or may not be possible to get these documents depending on what happened because of her overstay... Im not really sure how China handles polices certificates for foreigners though... Also, bad terms or not, because she was working on a tourist visa, she will never be able to get one if the requirements really are that she needs an employment letter, as that could likely call into question her ability to work legally. Edited by Moonandstar, 20 July 2010 - 10:20 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-07-20 22:17:00
US Embassy and Consulate Discussion	K-1 - Drug Test	Exactly. And if you answer "no I never used drugs" and they do a drugs test (like a hair sample) and find out that you did INDEED use drugs then we have a misrepresentation issue. Never lie to immigration. The waiver might be a pain in the ####### but it's possible whereas misrep isn't. I believe you'll need to see a psych about using. Exactly. If the Visa Officer asks you, "did you do drugs?" then your a little bit screwed. But no where does it say a misrepresentation can occur for lying to a doctor. Edited by Moonandstar, 29 May 2010 - 09:13 AM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-05-29 09:12:00
Philippines	HEPA-A VACCINE: WHAT AGE RANGE IS IT REQUIRED?	That is usually case for Hepatitis B vaccine. Hepatitis A can be spread via uncooked food and water that has been contaminated. I got the vaccine before I went to the Philippines. I don't think they give the vaccine to children under 1. I have read that people from areas with high incidence of Hepatitis A have more than likely all ready been exposed to it by age 10. Worth double checking though in case I am wrong. Yea, i believe that is correct, however last time i checked the vaccine chart i know HEP A wasn't on it, at least not for a 26 year old and without special circumstances. HEP A may be more prevalent in less developed countries, but i think the US has it pretty much stamped out, on the majority.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-07-23 05:21:00
Philippines	HEPA-A VACCINE: WHAT AGE RANGE IS IT REQUIRED?	Oh it's age appropriate, but from what I've seen it's mostly only given to those where it's occupationally appropriate or for those that are likely to come in contact with it. It's generally not issued. Edited by Moonandstar, 21 July 2010 - 11:03 PM.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2010-07-21 23:02:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Case Filing and Progress Reports	very impatiently waiting...	QUOTE (Darnell @ Oct 28 2009, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Relax, you... HAha!! O that lightend my spirits.... Brings back memories form my days at chenjiagou- u been around henan much darnell? But yea, i suppose your right, could be worse. I just feel like i spend more time worrying about visas than i spend actually in the country. @Carlawarla The return address on my package was'nt written, so thats another reason this is so nerve wreking.	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-10-27 12:03:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Case Filing and Progress Reports	very impatiently waiting...	QUOTE (Gary and Alla @ Oct 27 2009, 06:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> When the package first arrives it is reviewed to make sure the check is there, the check is signed and the forms are signed. If all that is correct, they will accept it for processing and send you a receipt, eventually. Exactly. But the only problem is, assuming the check is erroneous, how would they let me know?	Moonandstar	Male	China	2009-10-27 06:19:00