ForumTitleContentMemberSexCountryDate/Time
US Embassy and Consulate DiscussionAffidavit of support - self sponsoring
I find it weird that the I-134 seems to be more strict than the I-864 (which is the legally binding and seemingly more serious form). It's not just the matter of not being able to use my own assets but also the question about whether a co-sponsor can be used for the I-134 (been reading many conflicting opinions about that). I also don't see the logic in how it could not matter if I have enough assets to qualify for the 5 x 1,25 x poverty limit; one would assume it's slighly less likely that I'll become a public charge with a stable financial position. Oh well, this entire process is kind of confusing at times...
ErikandKatharineMaleSweden2008-08-23 18:43:00
US Embassy and Consulate DiscussionAffidavit of support - self sponsoring
I've read that if you're applying through London the beneficiary can use hos/her own assets as a way of self-sponsoring instead of using a co-sponsor in case the USC hasn't got enough assets/income for the I-134. Is this possible in other countries as well (I'm obviously particularly interested about conditions in Sweden)?
ErikandKatharineMaleSweden2008-08-23 09:54:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Case Filing and Progress ReportsApril 08 CSC filers
Woke up this morning to an e-mail from USCIS saying that we've got the NOA2! smile.gif I was convinced we'd get an RFE so I had already compiled a package of further evidence and sent to my girl overseas in anticipation of that, so it's a surprise and relief to get the NOA2. I hope that all of you who are still waiting won't have to suffer much longer!

Edited by ErikandKatharine, 23 August 2008 - 01:59 AM.

ErikandKatharineMaleSweden2008-08-23 01:57:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresBank Balance
Self-sponsorship is also possible in Sweden, they didn't even want the I-134 even though I brought it to the interview. Mabye that is also the case in other countries than England and Sweden?
ErikandKatharineMaleSweden2008-10-24 17:55:00