ForumTitleContentMemberSexCountryDate/Time
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)my wife was deported twice to mexico she as a deport record
QUOTE (Gaby&Talbert @ Apr 21 2008, 06:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (diadromous mermaid @ Apr 21 2008, 04:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
And with the whole immediate family in Mexico, and only the husband here, how would one prove hardship?


The hardship only applies to the USC. The 2 deportations may mean she is not eligable for the waiver

Exactly. What hardship would it be for the US citizen? He has clearly spent time in Mexico, per his signature.
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-04-21 17:04:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)my wife was deported twice to mexico she as a deport record
And with the whole immediate family in Mexico, and only the husband here, how would one prove hardship?
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-04-21 16:38:00
United Kingdomto file or not.

I am waiting on my US citizenship to come thru, should i wait to file for my wifes K3 or should i just apply now.
Any help appreciated.
Thanks.

:wacko:


K-type visas are only available to either a foreign born fiancé or foreign-born spouse of US citizen petitioners.
diadromous mermaidFemale02007-01-12 19:20:00
United KingdomThe Visa Journey UK Pub Quiz Thread!

P.S. No one has got them all correct....

"Whachoo mean Willis?"

Okay, okay....
"The"
diadromous mermaidFemale02007-03-06 12:49:00
United KingdomThe Visa Journey UK Pub Quiz Thread!

I think Mermie should be banned from playing this cos they know everything. :jest:


Is she from the UK?? If she is I won't exclude her....if she isn't......BANNED!! :lol: :lol: :lol:


Then I'm in!!!!!!!!!!! UK born and bred :dance:
diadromous mermaidFemale02007-03-06 12:03:00
United KingdomThe Visa Journey UK Pub Quiz Thread!

Okay, in that great British tradition I reckon we should have a pub quiz....I'll post five questions a day (unless I run out of questions/I get bored...or you lot do!) and the first one to answer gets a free bag of virtual crisps and a drink of their choosing...

Ready, on your marks....get set...GO!

1. Which UK politician was replaced by a tub or lard when he failed to turn up for a recording of TV quiz show Have I Got News For You?
2. In which UK TV series did actor Neil Morrissey make his first television appearance?
3. What did M*A*S*H stand for?
4. Which was the first British TV game show to be adapted for screening in the USA?
5. Which football team is the subject of the 1996 film Fever Pitch?


Roy Hattersley

Boon

Mobile Army Surgical Hospital

Krypton Factor

Arsenal
diadromous mermaidFemale02007-03-06 10:30:00
United KingdomBird's custard in US anywhere?

Thanks for all the replies everyone! I went holiday shopping two nights ago, and couldn't find anything anywhereeeeeeee :( Like you say, Cheeky, I've seen a lot of recipes that call for vanilla pudding instead. E, happy holidays to you too!!! :) (well, to everyone else too! :P ) Cerise, I wish I had some of that!! :lol: Hard to find *anything* up north here...no isles like that..international foods, etc. :( Oh, Marylou...WOODMANSSSSSSSSSSSS. :( For the longest time after I moved here about 11 years ago, I called our local supermarket (Econo Foods and Super One) Woodmans! Just couldn't get used to it..if they have Ambrosia there, I *so* wish I still had one near me...Craig lovessssssssssssssssssss Ambrosia rice pudding in particular, but no can do around here! Looks like I will have to order online, and probably not for New Year's now, but he will like it anytime I do it, I know. Oh yeah..and Cerise...going to make some mini sausage rolls for our get together, probably tomorrow night. :) So glad I got the recipe from you that time!!! :thumbs: Anneelizabeth, great to see you around..it's been awhile!!! For everyone else, thanks a lot for the links and replies (Cherry, dr lha, Janice, Kezz, ajames...) Hope you all have a WONDERFUL Christmas and even better New Year!! :thumbs: :) :) :) M.

We always used Blancmange in trifle and it can be made from scratch.
Blancmange

3 tablespoons cornstarch
1/3 cup sugar
1/8 teaspoon salt
1/2 cup cold milk
1 1/2 cups milk, scalded
1 teaspoon vanilla

Mix cornstarch, sugar, and salt; combine with cold milk. Gradually
add hot milk. Cook in double boiler, stirring until thick; cover
and cook 15 to 20 minutes. Add vanilla. Pour into molds, rinsed
with cold water; chill until firm. Serve with fresh or canned
fruits, cream or pudding sauce. If pudding isn't to be molded,
increase milk to 2 1/2 cups. The same amount of arrowroot or 6
tablespoons flour may be substituted for cornstarch. Serves 6.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-12-24 07:30:00
United Kingdomcan I purchase a house in the US before moving there
QUOTE (missing.my2angels @ Jan 6 2008, 02:23 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I have a quandary in that my fiancee needs to get her soon to be ex husband off of the mortgage. Without selling up and us starting afresh when I get over there in hopefully 7 months if the K1 goes quickly, is there a way I can get a mortgage here to buy the house jointly with my partner in the US or solely by myself?

Many thanks

David

As a non-resident alien, it might be tricky to find a lender that is willing to take the risk. Foreclosure process is impacted if the borrower is not a resident. However, there are companies that will, but the interest might be higher than practical. After you've secured a green card, LPRs are treated as US citizens by most lenders.
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-01-06 14:31:00
United Kingdomchild support arrearages, back taxes and dui's k 1visa
QUOTE (prima and jay @ Jan 20 2008, 09:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
a few financial irregularities.

Yikes! laughing.gif
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-01-22 14:56:00
United KingdomHelp!! Turned down for filing in London...Has this happened to you?
QUOTE (bunsk2007 @ Feb 7 2008, 02:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Has anyone having their Embassy Interview during this last week been in this situation ?!

US/UK married couple, living in UK, decide to move back together to US where USC mother lives......
USC files for UKC at London Embassy, petition is approved.

UKC files their part, all seems to go well until interview at London Embassy when the USC is told -I think I have this all correct- that

she is not (regarded as) a USC because she is living in the UK, even though she has birth cert. etc to proove it...

Embassy goes on to say that the USC should already be resident in the US and filing in the US on behalf of their partner...

I have just read this on another forum- it appears to have happened today. I was hoping this poster was also on this forum but having looked, can't find her here.

** To the lady who posted this!! I can't find you on this forum. I hope you don't mind me posting about you! **

I am trying to see if this has happened to anyone else- even the US spouse's US immigration lawyers in London are baffled and have not seen this happen before! They can't understand why the US spouse's petition was approved, if they are now saying she filed incorrectly.

Someone has posted a reply to this USC saying they wonder if the problem is that the sponsor to her UKC husband is resident in the US- he's wondering if the petitioner has to file in the same country that the sponsor is in?

I am nervous now- my interview is on Monday!



Use search term "domicile" and research what is required to demonstrate.
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-02-07 16:27:00
United KingdomAwful, cheesy pick-up lines
When I was a model in New York many years ago, after one of the shows a member of the press came backstage to compliment the designer that was being showcased and approached me to let me know he liked the last piece I had on. He said, "darlin' I think that piece is splendid. You know where that'd simply look fabulous? On my bedroom floor" laughing.gif
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-02-10 19:14:00
United KingdomTraditional English Sunday Roast
Average flour in the States is labelled "All Purpose", but I always remember buying flour in the UK and it was "Self Rising"
QUOTE (rocks @ Jan 18 2009, 08:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (Magenta @ Jan 18 2009, 07:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I found Bisto in Meijer, if you have any near you.

Yorkshires won't be the same in the States, something to do with the flour. Have read about loads of Brits having problems making them. sad.gif

sad.gif

i wonder what's different about the flour?


diadromous mermaidFemale02009-01-18 21:14:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusVisitors Visa from Russia - It can be done

How do you figure?

It was just my opinion :P
It's one persons word against the other as I see it. Suppose she has her self-petition (I-751) reviewed, wouldn't her most obvious rebuttal be, "he's just an upset spouse?" If she is willing to offer a bribe, she'll be willing to lie at that review as well.
And in response to bribery charges she could respond by saying, "I was afraid of losing my status, my husband withheld my supporting documents, I felt trapped, I didn't know what else to do, I came here to build a life together and he...etc.. etc.."
Like I said before, there was no need for her to obtain any false documentation. You guys had all the right documentation as any other married couple.
But you are right, it all falls into the USCIS's hands at this point. It will be interesting what the outcome will be.


I suppose it is entirely possible that an alien can assert that the US citizen spouse was upset, and I'm sure in some cases it might very well be true. I guess, in my opinion, whether that would be sufficient to overcome any suspicion of fraud (based on the USC's testimony that she was trying to bribe him) by USCIS, would depend on a number of factors. For example, whether the USC ends the marriage or the alien.

If, indeed, the alien chooses to leave the marriage, then I can't see much excuse for doing so prior to securing the recommended documentation, so there'd be no need to manufacture methods to secure it later.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-28 12:38:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusVisitors Visa from Russia - It can be done

In other words, she offered to PAY me for "faked" documentation, since she knew she would be leaving the marriage prior to the lifting of conditional residency.
I provided that information directly to the USCIS

As others have told you from another thread, this submission of information will probably be in her favor. A reasonable USCIS officer will simply view you as a disgruntled and unhappy former spouse. They'll take anything you give them with a grain of salt.
Now, if she offered this bribe to the insurance company, that would be a whole different ball game and the insurance company submitted this to ICE...



How do you figure? It's been my experience that the Service Centres and local offices are really very accommodating to US citizens. Not necessarily true about the birbery not being taken seriously, either. Why wouldn't evidence count with a US citizen? He is the one for whom USCIS was granting her privilege of residency, in the first place.

Edited by diadromous mermaid, 28 September 2006 - 07:28 AM.

diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-28 07:26:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusShe Dumped Me!!
QUOTE (mox @ Mar 9 2008, 12:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (diadromous mermaid @ Mar 9 2008, 10:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Wow! You are starting to sound like your nemesis, tito! laughing.gif

LOL!!!!! Sorry, but I'm just so sick of all the sugar-coating I see in this thread! biggrin.gif

Well, only the OP knows all of the facts. What we know at this time is that he is emotionally distraught. Perhaps we should give him some slack, eh ? wink.gif
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-03-09 12:51:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusShe Dumped Me!!
QUOTE (kd4uvc @ Mar 9 2008, 12:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I got hit by a bulldozer of a problem today. I do not expect sympathy from you. Just remember to pass the word to others that some of the friends they have will do harm. Since I am considered a threat to this forum, I will send my thanks and leave.

There is also a daughter, who needs care. Perhaps the decision was not simply your fiancée thinking solely of herself. smile.gif

QUOTE (mox @ Mar 9 2008, 12:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I don't think you're a threat kd4uvc. But here's why "that dog don't hunt:"

You flew her to St. Pete. because there was some reason she couldn't meet you in her home town. You probably wired her the money to buy her plane ticket. You haven't met her child because the child was too sick to travel. (What really happened: She lives in St. Pete and pocketed your money for the plane ticket. There is no child.)

She "fell in love" with you, you asked her to marry, but the timing just wasn't right for her yet. (What really happened: She never had any intention of marrying you, but she did enjoy all the money you spent on her.)

In the meantime, her child's medical expenses continue to climb. There have probably even been a few urgent calls in the night saying she needs money RIGHT NOW for some emergency operation. (What really happened: She has been milking you for money. You're probably in to this for thousands right now.)

You pushed her to make a decision. She has stalled you for as long as she can. Now she knows the gravy train is over, so she's breaking it off. OR it could be just another chapter. She'll make up with you, you'll send her more money, and she'll milk it a little longer.

How did I do?

You would find this community much more sympathetic with your plight if you were honest with us. I hate to see anyone scammed, but you need to drop the fairy tail world you've built around her and man up to the truth.



Wow! You are starting to sound like your nemesis, tito! laughing.gif
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-03-09 12:45:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusShe Dumped Me!!
He said he went to St. Petersburg.
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-03-09 12:40:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusMy wife left me!
QUOTE (Satellite @ Feb 22 2008, 10:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Unfortunately she left me...
I do not know what to say... I will not write here again... sad.gif



Oh goodness. I'm sorry to here this.
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-02-22 22:44:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusOh those wild and wonderful Russian Women

I agree that there are few an alien living in the US for under 5 years would qualify for. But there are ways to make that alien qualify. Add an out of wed lock child to the mix and the odds become in the alien's favor.

google 'sponsor deeming' as an example.

Additionally, it is NOT "the rest of her life".

Again I re-iterate the word "theory". Look over the I-864 again on what conditions must be met in order to be removed as sponsor.
1. Alien becomes USC.
2. Alien works 40 quarters.
3. Alien dies.
4. Alien leaves country forever.
Now imagine an alien who never works, never naturalizes, never leaves the country and out lives the sponsor!
Sounds like a life commitment to me.

If you are discussing theory, there's one more situation that can relieve a sponsor of his/her obligation under the Affidavit of Support
5. Or basis for eligibility to petition for permanent residency is either withdrawn/rescinded/denied and alien falls out of status and is subject to removal
:)

Edited by diadromous mermaid, 19 September 2006 - 04:44 PM.

diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-19 16:44:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusOh those wild and wonderful Russian Women


Yes, she can apply for another K1 or CR1 from Russia (if she decides to return). 90 days rule is not for her anymore because she met all requirements for the K1 with you. Even she was in US more than 90 days (because you got married, then applied for AOS), she did not overstay her visa. If she will now return to Russia and will apply for another K1 or CR1 - she can get these types of visas.
She will need a divorce certificate though.


Once her AOS is rejected, she will need to leave. If she overstays 90 days passed this time, it is my understanding that she would face a 3-10 year ban. (She would need a waiver in this case).

180 days
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-18 08:55:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusOh those wild and wonderful Russian Women

Are you basing this comment on the fact that through marriage she technically met the K-1 terms? My understanding is that while there is a legal posture, it predates the IMFA reform.

That was my understanding as well. I believe there was one case on point about a lady who met the technical terms of a K1 by getting married and then abandoning the original petitioner for another petitioner. Assuming all is done in good faith and in compliance of the bona fide marriage requirements. This will probably be a decision of an immigration judge since the lady should be placed in removal proceedings after the AOS denial. But it really depends which state she is in. Texas for example follows through, California just sends a letter.


There is an attorney that participates on BE that claims that a lawyer representing an alien in such a situation could fsahion a defense after the Dixson & Dawson cases, that occured prior to IMFA, using the legal posture that the terms of the K-1 were met once the beneficiary used the K-1 visa to enter, and married the petitioner within the 90 days allotted. If I remember correctly, there has been little case history in recent years, but who knows, perhaps it might work. All the same, the alien would have to be prepared to face a rather intensive legal battle.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-17 14:12:00
Russia, Ukraine and BelarusOh those wild and wonderful Russian Women

She chose to leave me for someone, then try to come back, but continue the affiar anyway.

Sorry for you loss Russ.
But just out of curiosity did she you leave you for another American or a Russian American living in your community?
In terms of immigration consequences she will be denied AOS if there is no response to the RFE. She might be able to squeeze in an I-360 for battered women in abusive relationship since there is some evidence of police involvement based on your other post.
However, she is better off abandoning this AOS application and pursuing a new I-130 if she marries her current lover. Because she met the technical terms of the K1 which was marriage to you and if it is determined that the marriage was bonafide she should be able to adjust status with her new petitioner if she goes that route. Unlawful presence is forgiven for marriage to a USC.
However, since you mention her returning to Russa, she will probably not be able to return after her AP documents expire or become void due to AOS denial. In a more distant future the lover in question can still petition for her through a K1 or K3 visa if they decide to go that route.
You might not be on the hook for the I-864 because AOS has not technically been granted. And even if you are there has been no case on VJ where the government has sued the sponsor because his beneficiary became a public charge.
However, I'd be more concerned about the outcome of your divorce proceeding, the last thing you want is for her to take her statutory share back to Russia or use it to start a new life in America.


Are you basing this comment on the fact that through marriage she technically met the K-1 terms? My understanding is that while there is a legal posture, it predates the IMFA reform.

If the AOS is denied, the I=864 falls with it.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-16 23:18:00
Mexico, Latin & South AmericaI-130

Claire, dear...don't get frustrated. I so want to help you with this question, but I am not as experienced with this as others, so hopefully someone else will jump in with some help. I was just speaking with my mom about this and she told me that if you should get married, it will "kill" his father's petition and you will have to start the process all over again. The petition is affected because by getting married he is now technically in a different category than he was originally petitioned for.
It looks like the NVC is moving on the petition since they have sent the AOS bill. With the new process, I am not sure how long it will take for him to get an interview, but I am sure it will be within months. If you can, hold off on the wedding, sweetie.

Your VJ Sis,
Tam

Just a point of clarification. If the father is only a permanent resident, and not a citizen, marrying would not place her SO in a different category, but it would render him ineligible for petitining by his father.


His father is a USC.

Claire


Then, if memory serves me well, he'd drop from First Preference to Third if he marries.
diadromous mermaidFemale02007-08-15 11:32:00
Mexico, Latin & South AmericaI-130

Claire, dear...don't get frustrated. I so want to help you with this question, but I am not as experienced with this as others, so hopefully someone else will jump in with some help. I was just speaking with my mom about this and she told me that if you should get married, it will "kill" his father's petition and you will have to start the process all over again. The petition is affected because by getting married he is now technically in a different category than he was originally petitioned for.
It looks like the NVC is moving on the petition since they have sent the AOS bill. With the new process, I am not sure how long it will take for him to get an interview, but I am sure it will be within months. If you can, hold off on the wedding, sweetie.

Your VJ Sis,
Tam

Just a point of clarification. If the father is only a permanent resident, and not a citizen, marrying would not place her SO in a different category, but it would render him ineligible for petitining by his father.
diadromous mermaidFemale02007-08-15 09:09:00
Mexico, Latin & South AmericaAnyone here know anything about an H2B visa
QUOTE (OrayneandI @ Jan 23 2008, 07:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I would like to get some help from people who have gone through or are familiar with the H2B visa process and have gotten married while in the US on that visa.

some questions are:
1. My soon to be husband is on H2B (seasonal employee) visa, he's been here for over a year and has to be re-sponsored by his company every 6 months. His I-94 expires April 2008. What happens when we file the paperwork for AOS and EAD, etc and it will of course take up to 90 days and his I-94 will have expired.
2. He is not staying with his current company, he is in Vail, CO and will be moving to TN with me... I'm assuming he will just resign from his job there and come here when the I-94 expires in April. We are getting married in February but he feels obligated to his employer since he is sponsored by them until April. So after we are married, he is going back to CO.

I have spoken with an attorney but they won't give me much assistance because I'm not paying them, of course which is understandable... we just don't want to run into any obstacles if he's out of status when the I-94 expires, and before the other paperwork is approved...

Any suggestions, or any ideas?

Thanks!



I thought the H2B was a temporary non-immigrant worker visa, with rather significant limitations. One year issue, no adjustment of status...not dual intent visa.
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-01-23 21:55:00
Mexico, Latin & South AmericaHelp, my boyfriend from USA had problems with police , he wants to come to live in Mexico and refuge
QUOTE (Anny @ Feb 17 2008, 05:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
helpsmilie.gif , HI EVERYONE, I NEED HELP, MY BOYFRIEND FROM USA GOT IN TROUBLES WITH AMERICAN JUSTICE , HE IS NOT GUILTY BUT POLICE WANTS TO SEE IT IN A WRONG WAY, HE DOESNT WANT TO GO TO JAIL, HE IS THINKING TO COME TO MEXICO AND LIVE WITH ME ALTHOUGH HE KNOWS HE CANT COME BACK TO USA ANYMORE, WE WANT TO MARRY IN MEXICO AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT I GUESS HE NEEDS PERMITION TO MIGRATION TO GET MARRY AND TO GET VISA TO WORK IN MEXICO, WHAT WE CAN DO?.......HE DOESNT WANT TO STAY THERE ANYMORE , HE IS SCARED WHAT POLICE THINK TO DO WITH HIM, AND HE WANTS TO HIDE IN MEXICO FOREVER, I WOULD SUPPORT HIM 100%, IF SOMEONE CAN HELP ME TO KNOW WHAT TO DO, WHAT PAPERS WE NEED TO GET , I WILL APRECIATE IT VERY MUCH sad.gif



First, do a little reading here:

http://www.mexperien...immigration.htm
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-02-17 17:45:00
Mexico, Latin & South AmericaI am ina predicament and need your assistance
QUOTE (phatmadame81 @ May 4 2008, 12:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi VJers, Iknow Ihave not been onin a while andit seemed like I have forgotten you but I had some things to deal with and now Iam back...
I have missed out on so much I feel lost going through the threads....
I do need your assistance once again..when in a bind if you can't turn to family who else can you turn to.

Have you ever heard of any one who after filing waited too long to finish up ( I started filing back in 06, it was approved the K3 went down and he, Jamaican spouse, let it expire, well the I130 which was at the NVC expired after one year of being there without payment but back in Feb 08 the husband sent off the Choice of Agent and they reopened it) well we are at the point where they are asking for the $70 and the $400 but I refuse to pay it and he said he is working on it but still cannot come up with it yet. I could pay it and struggle harder than I am right now, temporary, but I wanst him to make a contribution to the filing...more than just signing a piece of paper.
Well he found out that he still has his 10 year visa.....My question: Do you think he can travel on it and then when he comes here he gets a lawyer and work it out? Or do you think I should just let him keep working on getting the money to pay for the $470????????? I am at my wits end and just wanst him home...


Help me out would you!!!!!!!!!!!!

I know it will be said well I should wait it out but I really need to have him come home and after 2 years apart I realize it more than ever that I truely do love him and he truely does love and need me, well i need him too but he needs me more ( the whole good woman thing...no need to get into that )

I am just womdering where in the USA one can find an immigration attorney that can "work it out" for less than $470.00?
phatmadame, I am only a little concerned that if his inability to come up with funds causes you to hesitate with the process at this stage, how well-prepared are you to face the cold, and sometimes hard reality, that once he's here, it coul be a fair amount of time before he may be able to contribute financially to this protracted journey?
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-05-04 17:09:00
Europe & Eurasia (except the UK and Russia)Hilfe zum Anfang

Hallo an alle


ich bin total am durchdrehen, das hört sich alles so kompliziert an mit dem Visum.

Mein Freund ist in der Army war bis Juni in Deutschland stationiert und ist jetzt wieder zurück in die Staaten, habe ihn gerade erst besucht. Den Gedanken das wir heiraten wollen hatten wir schon bevor er zurück gegangen ist, wollten aber noch warten wie sich die Sache entwickelt. Wir würden gerne nächstes Jahr im Juni/Juli heiraten.


Also wir stehen ganz am Anfang mit der Visum-Geschichte und ich bin jetzt schon total durch den Wind. Also so wie ich das verstanden hab muss er dieses Formular ausfüllen (was sind das für Fragen?) und muss ich warten bis ich Nachricht aus Frankfurt bekomme?????


Sorry das ich so blöd frage, wäre super nett wenn mir jemand a bissl was schreiben könnte.


Danke für eure Mühen

No worries, just ask away. Since you've met within the last 24 months, your fiancé can petition the USCIS for a fiancé visa (I-129F). Look above on this page at the tab labelled guides and follow the instructions for 'fiancé visa'. There will be forms that you both fill out at various stages in the process. Once a fiancé visa is issued to you in Germany, you then use it to travel to the USA to marry (you must marry within 90 days of arrival on that type of visa). After the marriage, you would then jointly file an application (the process is called adjustment of status) to secure permanent residency. If you begin the process now, most likely you will receive the fiancé visa (if there are no complications) in good enough time to arrive in the USA and marry next summer.

After reviewing the Guide Section, feel free to ask any questions you have. There are many that have and are pursuing the same route, here.

Edited by diadromous mermaid, 27 August 2006 - 03:47 PM.

diadromous mermaidFemale02006-08-27 15:45:00
Europe & Eurasia (except the UK and Russia)andere frage..

ok andere frage..

wir denken nach D zu ziehen.. ist aber noch nicht 100% sicher..
hier ist nun mein problem..

ich werde in december nach D fliegen und erst mal bei meinen eltern wohnen bis das baby "kommt" im april.. joel (mein man) kommt zur geburt und bleibt fuer ein paar wochen da.. dann fliegt er wieder nach VA.. nun zu meinen problem..

ich muss meine 10 jaehrige green card vorher beantragen da die anfang juni ablaeuft.. kann ich die in D auch beantragen..? was passiert wenn ich sie nicht beantrage? ich weiss nicht wann ich wieder nach VA komme.. ich denk mal das ich wieder komme wenn das baby 4-5 monate alt ist
oder joel zieht nach D.. wir wissen es noch nicht genau.. und wir muessen dann seine papiere beantragen.. und dann brauch ich meine green card eh nicht mehr..

was denkt ihr?


An individual with a conditional green card can leave the country for short absences, but if they expect to be outside the country for more than a year, then a re-entry document will be required. If you do intend to spend substantial time in Germany, also make certain that you retain ties to the USA to preserve your permanent residency (beyond those ties that your husband will have, while he stay behind here).
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-09-16 11:28:00
Europe & Eurasia (except the UK and Russia)Married To A German :)
Nuss Stengli?
QUOTE (Dr. ZoSo @ Jul 4 2009, 09:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
After speaking with her parents my wife told me they (the in-laws) want to know what I would like from Germany. My wife is going home in September and this has been the second or third time they have asked me.

So I ask you....Any ideas? Can you think of anything unique that I cant think of?


diadromous mermaidFemale02009-07-04 21:02:00
Asia: East and PacificIncome Taxes

Hi diadromous mermaid,

Thanks for your reply. I'm more concerned with the "sensitive info" of our co-sponsor (father) than that of myself. I realize now after your reply that I'm already exposed, but the tax returns of our co-sponsor show identity info for multiple members of my family.

Any follow-up thoughts?

STL_HCMC

No. It's moot anyway, because the I129F asks for the petitioner's Soc Sec number, and payment in the form of a check would show the bank acct number. Hopefully, the consulate and USCIS know how to keep this information as secure as any other agency.


Once again, moot. The form I-864 asks for the sponsor's soc sec number. I think, in this case, one is going to have faith that the information will be guarded as proprietary.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-07-05 08:59:00
Asia: East and PacificIncome Taxes

Hi Everyone!

Have a couple of quick questions regarding the tax return requirements of the US Consulate in HCMC. Perhaps those with interview experience will be able to help me with some answers.

1. When they request "tax returns" from the previous 3 years, does that include the federal and state filing?

2. Did any of you "black out" sensitive information (i.e. social security number, bank account info for direct deposit of tax refund, etc.) on the "photocopies" of the tax returns, bank statements, etc.? I'm a little concerned about identity info like this floating around.


I've got both the federal and state returns for '05, '04 and '03 for both myself and our co-sponsor, but just wanted to have her take exactly what was needed. We also have the tax transcripts for both myself and our co-sponsor.

Thanks in advance for your input!

STL_HCMC


No. It's moot anyway, because the I129F asks for the petitioner's Soc Sec number, and payment in the form of a check would show the bank acct number. Hopefully, the consulate and USCIS know how to keep this information as secure as any other agency.

Edited by diadromous mermaid, 05 July 2006 - 08:07 AM.

diadromous mermaidFemale02006-07-05 08:06:00
Africa: Sub-SaharanHumilating An Alien fiance

I want to thank all Vj members for all their suggestions and contributions during the process of my k-1 visa process.

Please I need your help one more time,
I entered here on k-1 visa 9th june 2006,spent just 2 weeeks with my U.s fiance,but we were not
living together as she wanted it so I cooperated,that is not enough,she kept finding faults and
make my stay hre in the U.S frusting and always saying at any little misunderstanding that she won't marry
meany more.
I and her pastor has tried to make this marriage work but she still insisted not to marry me.
This lady has made things so hard for me since the past 5o days plus i have spent here in U.S.
To summarrize all in short. yesteday,she sAid her decision is she can't marry me.
I have been sponsoring myself since I came here till now and she doesn't care
and I don't have any more money to spend and she has decided not to marry me.
And my return tickets has expired on the 5th July 2006.
Based on the Affidafit of support she sign to take care of me till I start working.
I am frusted right,No money to take care of myself,No return ticket back home.

Please what legal action can I take to sustain myself here and to get ticket fare back home before the
90 days expires.I am really hurting emotionally.
I have left all, my good payed job,home (apartment), all for the U.S and
My usc fiance want to frustrute me.
Can I legally make any sort of claims for losing all for for her intentionally frusting me.
resigning from my work and emotional turture.

Please I will need your valueable suggestions and answerrs to this questions.
Thanx in advance.


Sorry to hear of your dilemma. The problem is two-fold. First, the I-134 is a contract between the US petitioner and the government, and two the contract is not legally binding. In so far as she wishes not to proceed with the marriage, can't you come to some sort of compromise, that with her financial assistance (as in purchasing a ticket for you to return) you will be happy to leave? it would seem to me that this suggestion would suit both parties. Good luck.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-08-02 15:05:00
Africa: Sub-SaharanAlready have a wife.......
Where is your husband in his immigration process? Does he have a conditional green card?
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-03-31 19:21:00
Africa: Sub-SaharanDENIED at 2. interview
QUOTE (Omoba @ Apr 19 2008, 08:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thank you all.

It will be difficult to prove and convince the AO of EXTREME hardship. That is why I need an attorney, I have read it is not easy and to not even bother if not enough evidence exists. The extreme hardship burden of prove is the killer, it is not as simple as filling out a waiver form and submitting it.
It is also more difficult to present the case as a fiance , for married couples and with kids it is a little smoother.
The USC has to convince the AO that if the ' family member ' will not be allowed to be in the US, then extreme hardship is a direct result of it.
" Misrepresentation ", alleged or real, imagined or fact will automatically result in a lifetime ban of entering the US for the beneficiary.


I am sorry to hear the bad news. Curious about the misrepresentation being material though. The regulations stipulate that
QUOTE
Under INA §212(a)(6)©(i), an alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or entry into the United States or other benefit provided under the INA is excludable. The determination of materiality is a fact which would make an alien excludable or shut off a line of inquiry which may have resulted in exclusion.
. My question is how could misquoting a date of birth be material. He was either eligible for a B1 or not, Why would age be a factor?
diadromous mermaidFemale02008-04-21 19:21:00
National Visa Center (Dept of State)Questions reg. I864 package - address - supporting documents

Hello,

I have a few more questions about the I864:

1) Right now I have following mailing address:

National Visa Center
ATTN: CMR
32 Rochester Avenue
Portsmouth, NH 03801-2909

- Is this one still correct?

2) We downloaded the I864 from the USCIS website. Based on the instructions, we would have to deliver the federal tax returns for the last three years. However, I have read that only one tax return might be required.

- Do we have to send the federal tax returns for the last or the last three years?
- Are W2's required?
- Are pay stubs required?

3) Is the form on the USCIS website (11/05/01) still the most recent one?

4) We sent the check for the AOS Fee Bill today, by overnight courier. Is it reasonable to assume that the NVC will generate the I864 form next Monday?

Thank you,

Michigan


Marriage-based AOS submissions after November 23, 2005 are only required to provide one year of tax returns, the most recent year.

W-2s are considered part of an IRS 1040 (E, EZ, A) if the taxpayer earned income as an employee, so I would enclose them if you are providing a copy of an IRS 1040. Alternatively, if you provide an IRS generated transcript or statement, if memory serves me correctly, they may not be required.

Paystubs are a proof of income.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-06-21 07:09:00
National Visa Center (Dept of State)I-864 Experiences

The definition of assets includes that they must be easily converted to cash within 12 months (or language similar to that). 1/3 ownership does not guarantee that the business (farm) couild be liquidated easily without consent of the other partners.
The personal assets might be more the key to success. Check out the 5X vs 3X--I hear the new I-864 rules are lower.



Agreed on the necessity for liquidity. Yes, of course, the language of the partnerwhip contract would be key in determining if his equity interest is convertible within 12 months. Many, but of course not all, partnership agreements provide covenants that declare first right of refusal for the entity or remaining partners to buy out another's share. If that is indeed the case, then it might be possible
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-07-13 08:20:00
K-3 Spousal Visa Case Filing and Progress ReportsPaulasue you will be missed!!!
Tragic! I hope all that knew her find the answers and comfort that they need.
diadromous mermaidFemale02009-06-28 17:57:00
IMBRA Special TopicsHelp! New K1 requirement-Need waiver if more than 2 petitions!!
I agree with the suggestion to consult with an immigration attorney. One off the cuff comment, that I'd like to add is that having withdrawn the petitions prior to the beneficiaries' use of the visa will be taken into consideration.
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-06-22 12:25:00
IMBRA Special TopicsTo those of you griping about IMBRA





diadromous mermaid



The comparison of "seconds" for putting on your seatbelt and waiting for "months" is a very significant difference. Being one of the recalled petitons has made it very obvious to me that the agencies involved in implementing IMBRA were totally unprepared.

That being said, I agree with the philosophy behind the law, I just disagree with how it was rolled out initially. As for the rest of the details behind the law, I don't care at this point, I just want to get the K1 process done. If someone is trying to abuse the system, hopefully the new law will make it harder for them, maybe not. It's been debated continuosly.



Do you realise just how short-sighted that statement appears? 'Seconds' everytime you buckle up, that could be several times a day, 365 days a year, for as many years as you continue driving...as compared to a month, once in a lifetime. Any law newly implemented will cause some ripple effect, it's nature. We don't have the ability to 'stop the clock, cease all activity, to put it into action, before we resume'. In business, this happens daily, and we all take it in stride. I think if those involved with IMBRA (and that means all petitioners and beneficiaries of K visas) were to begin to really contemplate how it is ensuring their own safety, you;d have less to gripe about. I'm not sure of your background (i.e. are you the petitioner or the beneficiary) and I haven't looked at your sig to confirm, but if you're the petitioner and have not commited any act that could give rise to any scrutiny by USCIS, think, if you will about your beneficiary. Someone you love dearly, correct? Had he or she not met you, it's quite conceivable that at some point in time he/she could be party to a petition by someone who does give USCIS cause to scrutinise. Woudl you wish that on your loved one?


Not shortsighted at all actually. In fact your statement comparing the time it takes to buckle up your seatbelt to the time people have to wait for the implementation of IMBRA is really totally irrelevant. You could have said the same about the time it takes to brush to prevent cavities or pick your nose to prevent boogers. :yes: The point is IMBRA was implemented or "rolled out" in a very inconsistent and inefficient manner. If you were not affected by the process, you possibly have less understanding of the process. I was affected as were many VJer's. I'm sorry if you can't understand my main point- I am not philosophically against IMBRA, just not happy with being a guinea pig for the new law ok? As for your statement about the business world, yes, that's wondeful businesses can adjust. The government is not a business, unfortunately, and nothing in the process after IMBRA was implemented has been done in a "businesslike manner". As many people have said before, if the government was in the businessworld, then it would go out of business rather quickly. As for griping, I'm not the one who is complaining about the law itself, I actually think the ideas behind it are good things.

All I can say is reread my post. I never said I was philosophically against IMBRA. As for the personal questions about my "loved one" I won't answer that because it's just a emotional appeal that attempts to cloud my original statement. I suggest you read some of the posts about the recalled petitions and the people that are still waiting to be approved.


Actually, it's not at all irrelevant. And to compare it with brushing one's teeth is not at all the same thing. One brushes one's teeth to prevent cavities and to ensure continued health. If you don't brush then you only have yourself to blame should you end up with a mouth full of rotting teeth. In other words, the end result of not brushing is self-imposed. On the other hand, in everyday life, we do things such as buckling up to prevent harm from others' mistakes in judgment, not just our own. Whichever way you look at it, in a system where people are at different levels of processing, to implement any new procedure is going to cause a wrinkle or two. Perhaps it is unfortunate that this new legislation's implementation in 2006 just happened to catch a few who are in mid-stride, but on the whole, I can't imagine anyone grumbling about the procedure, if one is altruistic, that is. The incidence of battered aliens is on the rise. Many are fearful to report it, just as they are fearful to leave the abuser. And predators use that to their advantage, believe me.

If I were an intending immigrant alien at this time, and especially one for whom English may be a second language, I'd be thankful for the extra scrutiny, and with electronic communication as popular and as widespread as it is nowadays, the problems without more due diligence would only escalate. Predators have access to anyone in the world now, with online fora and chatrooms. And believe me, anyone is potential prey.

This is not meant to be a personal statement, but a general one. Rather than grumble about its implementation, I'd be thankful that your loved one has some comfort of knowing that what you say is a squeaky clean record, is indeed that. I know I would.


Irrelevant comparisons go both ways. The issue is not seat belts, toothbrushing , nor nose picking. I refuse to agree that "grumbling" about IMBRA implementation implies that one is not altruistic and I think many others affected by it would agree. You can choose to believe that just because people affected by the slowdown and backlog caused by the inefficient implementation of IMBRA are upset means they are against the philosophies behind the law but you are wrong. It appears to me you are more concerned about the law itself than how it actually has affected the present petition process.

A wrinkle or two? Where have you been?

You still don't get it, in my previous 2 posts I stated I agree with the general philosophy behind IMBRA. I really don't need a lecture on IMBRA and it appears to me at this point you are just using this opportunity to justify the reasons behind it. Why? IMBRA is already law. You don't have to convince me of anything and I'm done talking about it.


Fair enough, but I've been here quite some time and have read many threads on VJ pertaining to the implementation pitfalls. I am not pontificating the law, I'm recommending that while in the ideal world, no one would have been caught in a loop, how often do we actually live in an ideal world. If you are not against the law, as you say, I'll accept that, but if you support the concept, then to be alturistic would be to tolerate the delay with an eye to knowing that those that follow you may benefit from some of the heartache you have had to endure.

By the way, and this is just curiosity on my part, but how is it that you are asking where I've been? I don't recall going anywhere, although I do note that you've only been active on VJ since June of 2006. :)
diadromous mermaidFemale02006-08-09 19:44:00