ForumTitleContentMemberSexCountryDate/Time
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresOverwhelmed and looking for advice
Have you looked into DCF considering you are already in your fiances country.....Perhaps worth looking at the residency requirements for filing there. Much quicker and its an immigrant visa, plus its the green card on entry.

http://netherlands.usembassy.gov/immediate_relatives.html

http://netherlands.usembassy.gov/immigrant_visa.html

Policy changed recently where consulates are now only requiring the most recent tax year for I-864 for DCF, but you would need to confirm that with the individual consulate.



- Are these two statements correct?

Yes

- Is there any flexibility in the 3 tax years, meaning since I have a job lined up in the US, is there anyway I can use that as proof of income?

It could help.


I will let someone else with more knowledge and incite answer the latter further.

Lorelle

Edited by aussiewench, 25 May 2006 - 07:46 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 07:39:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresNVC Administrative Review


Aussiewench, I think you are right. Bwaadrent, may I ask your 'received date'.

thanks


My received date is 1 March, my NOA 1 date is 3 March, so I should be cool.

Yep, as I thought.....you fall outside of the IMBRA :thumbs:

What you are dealing with at NVC now with AR, many go through and nothing to do with IMBRA.

Can you edit the date for your NOA1 in your timeline to reflect the received date on your NOA1. It all helps with the stats.

Edited by aussiewench, 26 May 2006 - 08:16 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 08:14:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresNVC Administrative Review

Bwaadrent's NOA1 is 3/7/06. Is that right? that means their case is under IMBRA effect.

So it is interesting that their case is at NVC and not returned to CSC.

Does that mean California is processing cases of NOA1 3/6 or after?

Just wondering...........

I am going to assume here that what Bwaadrent has as the NOA1 date is the 'notice date' and not the 'received/receipt' date that one should be using. Many use/refer to the wrong date when it comes to the NOA1.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 00:23:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresNVC Administrative Review
Larry and Maria

I agree with rlt. NVC has nothing to do with the necessary steps that need to be taken for the recalled petitions. The recalled petitions will have to meet the requirement before being re-approved and this will be done with USCIS at service centers.

Many go on AR at NVC level and it is mostly completed within 6 weeks.......results though are sent through to the consulate. If consulate is waiting on clearances and an interview has already been held, the visa will not be issued until it is complete.

Good luck with it....hope it is completed soon for you.

Lorelle
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 12:09:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresNVC Administrative Review
Im lost on this one too :unsure:
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 10:56:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresVisa Denials
Here is the thread that Marc Ellis himself posted a few months back

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=6769&hl;=ellis
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 08:10:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresPlease read
Nope
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 14:41:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresMY Case GET RECALL after my Interview APPROVED!!!


Look at this posting on the state govt web site. At least they have the decency to post something unlike the USCIS sites...


You're kidding right? You think they have some decency to post something, somewhere almost 3 months AFTER the law went into effect and they screwed up? Don't you think decency would have been to contact each petitioner via email to let them know what is happening? Or given that they had plenty of notice, the decent thing to do would have been to post this information in January so people planning to file would know it was coming, and then to post the new forms on March 6 so anyone getting ready to file could actually use the correct forms. I'm sorry - I know this has nothing to do with you and you actually think this a good thing. I, on the other hand, think this is a complete and utter outrage. The inefficiency of USCIS is shocking beyond my comprehension. These people are affecting our lives in a major way and the only thing they can do is post something on the state government website. Clearly, I am FURIOUS (with this situation - not with your comment). For anyone else stuck in this limbo, there is ZERO information available. The people at the USCIS 800 number know NOTHING. There is no information on when forms for providing "possible criminal background information" from the USC will be sent. Maybe it will be next week. Maybe it will 3 months. There is no information on what the delay after sending the forms back in will be. At that point they will be so backlogged it could be months. The ONLY thing to do now is contact your senator and congressman. Fill out the privacy release, write a letter, and fax it or hand deliver it. This is outrageous and we cannot just sit back and hope they figure out how to clean up their own mess. They won't do it if we don't push them.

ummmmmmmm TomSara were basically saying the same as you but in short. The gov site referred to is DOS (Department of State) and they have nothing to do with IMBRA or the decision to recall petitions. TomSara was just saying at least there was some info via the telegram sent to Consulate Posts by DOS, unlike the USCIS which approves petitions and gave the directive to DOS to recall petitions from the Consulate Posts.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 23:45:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresOverstayed?
I found this.....

Please keep in mind that there is an important difference between an J-1 visa and J-1 status. A J-1 visa is the stamped page in your passport placed there by a U.S. Consular Officer for entry purposes only. J-1 status is granted once you enter the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and USIA. Even if your visa in your passport is valid, you can still lose your legal J-1 status if you do not comply with the applicable immigration laws regulating your stay in the U.S. If you fail to maintain your legal J-1 status, you will need to apply for reinstatement, or in some cases, be forced to leave the country.


Also if you are looking at a K-1 visa.....you need to find out if the 2 year home residency rule applies to you.

Edited by aussiewench, 28 May 2006 - 12:55 PM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 12:52:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresOverstayed?
Are you still in the US with your fiance? I'm presuming you have one as you have posted in the K-1 forum.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 11:25:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresReceipt Number and Case Number Decoded

Now that is interesting...how did you find that out??? :)

Its from the USCIS website. If you get a chance go have a look around. Lots of interesting/informative reading there.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 12:32:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Proceduresg-325a address questions
Im not sure on using government registered addresses as Im not familiar with that and what the difference would be. Just dont leave any gaps in the timeframe as there has been RFE's for such. Yes you can use a supplimentary sheet. Just make note of it on the actual form to see supplement. Put as much address info as is known.

As for the Q on address outside of the US of more then one year, it is whatever address regardless of when. If its the current one then that is what is put. If its one from years ago then that address is written there.

You only need to list addresses that were actual residences....where you received mail, bills etc.

Lorelle
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 12:23:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresNOA2 Expirery


What if my petition expires?

Consular officers have the authority to extend the validity of petitions that have expired. Because many petitions often expire before an applicant can be interviewed, officers at the Consulate routinely extend the validity of K-1 petitions.


:yes:

Our noa2 expires 7/7 & since Gav may not have his inetrview by then-the embassy told me no problem-they will just extend it. I appreciate that-but I wish they would just get moving already :lol:

yeah that must be so frustrating Irish....you're almost there though and hopefully there wont be any more hurdles *knock on wood*
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 12:57:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresNOA2 Expirery
What if my petition expires?

Consular officers have the authority to extend the validity of petitions that have expired. Because many petitions often expire before an applicant can be interviewed, officers at the Consulate routinely extend the validity of K-1 petitions.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 12:30:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIT HAS BEEN NOW SOON 4 WEEKS SINCE CSC HAS SENT NOA2!!
goldie

What I am saying is to stay on top of things....emailing service center, calling NVC. If you get no answers, yes contact your congressman and have him ask the questions for you. Just dont let the not knowing go on & on for weeks on end. A month is still within the range though.....once its getting to 5-6 weeks then start jumping up and down. Melo is another member who's petition recently went walkabout.

And congressman will ask the questions. You may not always get the answers you want, but they will ask when it warrants the asking.

Please try not to stress at this stage. That wasnt my intention to cause you more worry. Give it just a little more time. From memory, I think they do give a time frame when petitions are forwarded to NVC, just cant remember what that is right now.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 04:34:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIT HAS BEEN NOW SOON 4 WEEKS SINCE CSC HAS SENT NOA2!!

]Aussie, big thanks for the horror stories! Grrrr.
When my fiance reads this, I will have a hard time calming her down, as she has been barely keeping it together lately.

Sorry Jedi, but needs to also be said. The horror stories I mention are freely available on here in their own threads. Stuff ups do happen (whilst rare in these instances), and if people are not aware of them, how are they going to be responsible for their own case and know what to do from others experiences if they are not aware of them. Knowledge is power. All of the cases I mentioned also all worked out just fine.

Lorelle
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 01:37:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIT HAS BEEN NOW SOON 4 WEEKS SINCE CSC HAS SENT NOA2!!
Im sorry you are so stressed, completely understandable. I have seen many posts in the past where it has taken 3-4 weeks for petitions between CSC and NVC.....and then it can take a little while for NVC to acknowledge receipt of it. Give it another week and if you havent heard anything, call or email your congressman. There has been petitions in the past that have been forwarded to the wrong department (Mellie comes to mind) and been extremely difficult to trace.......there was even a whole batch that mistakenly got sent to archives from NSC :blink: Im not saying this to worry you more.....but to advise you to stay on top of it. Keep calm, as I wouldnt be surprised if it shows up within NVC over the next week.

*hugs*

Lorelle
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 15:26:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresQuestion regarding parental consent
pretz

You really do need to do a lot more reading on this as to what is required. For one you will not be able to work straight away..........and mostly all embassies will ask for an I-134 and along with that most embassies require the sponsor to meet the appropriate level of income re the poverty guidelines. That is just for starters. To adjust status once a visa is issued and you have entered the US, your partner will then have to complete an I-864 affidavit of support and income must meet 125% of the povertly guidelines. If she is not 18 she is unable to do that as she wont be of legal age to sign it. If she is 16 now, it sure doesnt take 2 years to get a fiance visa.

Have a read around this site.....the Guides and FAQ at the top....lots of things you need take in.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 10:16:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresQuestion regarding parental consent
Something else to consider. Whilst one can use a co-sponsor for the visa, when it comes to AOS in the US she will need to be at least 18 to be the sponsor with the I-864. Correct?
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 08:52:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresPetitions under IMBRA effects

The posting on http://travel.state....grams_2927.html says

The Department presently has no information about the extent of delay for these cases. In the meantime DHS will send additional questionnaires to the petitioners inquiring about their possible criminal backgrounds.


And why would the Department (DOS) have any information? They are not the ones that approve or make decisions on petitions. They are a completely seperate entity to USCIS.


Exactly. Since we all know that "the department" has no any information, why on earth would they include the words "the department has not information" in the "memo"they posted on the Travel.state.gov website?

That is a telegram from DOS to Consulate posts. I think that would be self explanitory.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-28 08:36:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresPetitions under IMBRA effects

I think it means that they have no clue how to handle this, no plans for how to fix it and proves that USCIS is a thoroughly f*cked up and inefficient US government entity. If they actually knew what to do, they would have provided the information to petitioners before March 6. I doubt they are working on anything right now.

The posting on http://travel.state....grams_2927.html says

The Department presently has no information about the
extent of delay for these cases. In the meantime DHS will
send additional questionnaires to the petitioners
inquiring about their possible criminal backgrounds.

And why would the Department (DOS) have any information? They are not the ones that approve or make decisions on petitions. They are a completely seperate entity to USCIS.

Edited by aussiewench, 27 May 2006 - 11:54 PM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 23:53:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresPetitions under IMBRA effects
The link isnt working.....can you try posting it again
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 16:24:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresWhat if we do this?

I'm just not used to "someone else" having so much control over my life. I can choose to buy a ticket and see Luz but powers beond my control prevent me from bringing her back with me. It is SO frustrating!!
But you know what? IN 6 DAYS I WILL BE WITH MY BABY AGAIN IF ONLY FOR TWO WEEKS!!!! That is so good for the soul!!!

Yeah it is Gary and I hope you and Luz have a perfect, wonderful 2 weeks together, which I'm sure you will. Put this immigration stuff aside and just enjoy :luv:
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 11:38:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresWhat if we do this?

"Please forgive my ignorance as I'm a newbie here and I'm about to mail my first I-129F submission this coming Tuesday, but I'm confused about all this talk of IMBRA. If I understand the threads clearly, has USCIS/DHS taken current and also incoming submissions and put them on some kind of hold, until they decide what kind of changes they need to make to the process? Because, I'm seeing people here getting approved and getting the Visa's. From what I've gathered looking through the numerous member's timelines, most have gotten through the entire process in less than 6 months.

If USCIS/DHS requires additional info - background checks, it is my hunch that they would first have to officially announce it and then designate a date when it goes into effect. All this second guessing and hearsay seems a bit unnerving. Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful that people here are willing to share information but I hope that we're all careful not to spread disinformation or rumor. Just my 2 cents."

The above is a quote from another thread. This is part of what worries me about the second guessing being done here.

I would pose this - are those of you who are presently in the IMBRA "black hole" perhaps suggest that those USC's who are about to submit a petition hold off? Are we confusing people doing research to the extent that they will attempt to submit background checks, etc. and other documents that will cause them RFE's.

The potential for impacting other lives here is great.

:thumbs:

and 'here here' Gary

Edited by aussiewench, 27 May 2006 - 10:04 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 10:01:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresWhat if we do this?


How about ...

To whomever it may concern,

I, USC petitioner name, am hereby submitting my criminal background information, as requisited by the Department of State, in compliance to the International Marriage Broker Regulation Act, for processing of my I-129F petition for my fiance(e), name of foreign fiance(e).

Name of USC
Signature


:thumbs:

Guys guys!! You cant send something as a directive of anything regarding DOS. DOS and USCIS are two seperate entities. DOS has nothing at all to do with USCIS.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 11:35:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIMBRA

Watching and waiting for updates with everyone else... But here are some articles to consider that raised a question for me. According to these, it is only US "Men" who are petitioning for their fiances that this law effects. In fact, on the petition against IMBRA that they are seeking sigs for, to be eligible to sign, you must be a US man..... hmmmmmmmm

http://www.usaimmigr...leaseIMBRA.html
and link to other news regarding IMBRA & Immigration
http://www.usaimmigr...picswindow.html

Do women petitioners get lucky and bipass these IMBRA regulations???

Not only men. If you read the act it is not gender specific.....USC women are included. I would cut and paste the relevent parts that say this only Im sick of reading it over and over :blink:

Yeah, thats the same link that is posted in quite a few places on this board.....but once more dont matter :P

Lorelle

Edited by aussiewench, 27 May 2006 - 09:23 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 09:20:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIMBRA

this might be a dumb question...and forgive me if it is....but if it was a restraining order...why would they have to go all the way back to march...why not start the whole additional security check when the restraining order expired?

Simply because the law came into effect march 6
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 11:12:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIMBRA
fitnlivly

It was a temporary restraining order which is now obviously no longer in effect. The temporary restraining order would of only been in effect until the court ruled and that was expected after the 04/24/06. The temporary restraining order is possibly the reason why so many petitions where approved after 03/06/06 as the service centers was operating business as usual with no directives to do otherwise until they were legally able to do so.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 10:52:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIMBRA
It wasnt just issued though.....that was back in early March.

Updates on that particular case..

UPDATE MARCH 23, 2006
The Court's Hearing on Preliminary Injunction scheduled on March 20, 2006 was postponed by the Court at the request of the Government (Defense Counsel) with the consent of Plaintiff to the new date of April 03, 2006 at 9:30 AM. Defense Counsel had failed to file with the Court Clerk an "Entry of Appearance", and thus was not provided notice of the hearing date by the Clerk's Office. On March 22, 2006, the Government, through Assistant U.S. Attorney Alonzo Long, filed an "Entry of Appearance" with the Court Clerk's Office. The Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) will continue, by consent of the parties, until April 03, 2006. Per Order of Cooper, D.J., March 22, 2006.

UPDATE APRIL 05, 2006
OFFICIAL STATUS OF EC CASE ON THE PUBLIC DOCKET OF THE COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
Minute Entry for Proceedings held before Judge Clarence Cooper: Preliminary Injunction Hearing held on 4/3/2006. Witnesses sworn; Exhibits admitted; Court took motion under advisement, Parties to submit proposed findings as to their respective positions by 4/24/06. Parties to agree to extend the TRO until Court rules on the Preliminary Injunction. Court consolidated the Preliminary Injunction hearing with the trial on the merits. (Court Reporter: Entered: 04/05/2006)
NOTE FROM GB: A DECISION IS NOT EXPECTED UNTIL AFTER 04/24/06.

As petitions have been recalled it would seem that as soon as the case was heard, regardless of outcome the temporary restraining order would of been lifted.

Does anyone know the actual outcome of it?
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-25 10:03:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIMBRA letters


americanwoman

K-3 does come under IMBRA even though it is stated those petitions wouldnt be recalled. It is all K nonimmigrant petitions which includes the K-3

Also........Nice job with all the letters being written by everyone to congressmen :thumbs:


Aussiewench,

I know K3's fall under IMBRA but they are being handled differently as the 2 people are already married and the US government cannot force divorce. Hence I am assuming (###? you? me?) that there will be different procedures applied to K3's, implemented at the same time as K1 procedures.

And thanks for the snub on "...being written by everyone to congressmen". I merely contacted Lifetime in addition to government officials to create as much awareness to this issue as possible. Not that I think it will truly help......I'm so deflated at his point.

no snub intended at all :) I think any letters to congressmen or anyone for that matter where peoples dismay in how this has been handled is perfectly ok. I actually originally had 'congressman etc' but took it out as I wont encourage the same to USCIS because in my mind that may cause more harm then good. Quite simple really. And I know you and everyone else is finding this time extremely difficult. I don't spend a lot of time in the K-1 forum for nothing you know.....I do care.

On the K-3......No they cannot force a divorce but they can deny a petition or a visa. And all K nonimmigrant petitions will undergo the background checks for criminal history and multiple petitions.

Lorelle

Edited by aussiewench, 27 May 2006 - 10:13 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 10:11:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresIMBRA letters
americanwoman

K-3 does come under IMBRA even though it is stated those petitions wouldnt be recalled. It is all K nonimmigrant petitions which includes the K-3



Also........Nice job with all the letters being written by everyone to congressmen :thumbs:

Edited by aussiewench, 27 May 2006 - 08:54 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-27 08:51:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Procedureswhat about me
Good to hear gugu that you DO have a lawyer :thumbs: Be guided by them then considering the facts of your case. I wish you all the very best. Let us know what happens aye :)

Lorelle

Edited by aussiewench, 29 May 2006 - 08:26 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 08:25:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Procedureswhat about me
gugu24

Ok.......this is getting more complicated. By what you are saying you did marry but the previous divorce wasnt valid.....(I presume) making the marriage void???? The divorce is now legal so you have filed for K-1???? Seriously darlin', have you gotten legal advice on all this lol dammmmm. If not I would seriously think about it so there isnt any complications come the interview.
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 07:18:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & Procedureswhat about me
A little confused. Is she your fiance still or now your wife? An I-129F for a fiance cannot be filed if you are already married. K-1 visas are for fiances only. I am curious why you filed the I-130 back in 2003. Which visa was it for? Did they give you the reasons for denial? Too many details missing in order to tell you if you are on the right track or if you need a consultation with an immigration lawyer.

Edited by aussiewench, 29 May 2006 - 06:42 AM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 06:41:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresRelief!!!!


...but it can be addicting so watch out!!!! :D


You're right; VJ is addictive! :lol:

and it has its share of b!tchfighting Posted Image A typical family lol
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 17:31:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresRelief!!!!

QDILLY PLS remove that pic... Ialmost lost my lunch. Those kind need warnings! :no:

I was going to say something in another thread hahahaha If I see the ID coming up I've been closing my eyes as I scroll past Posted Image
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 14:53:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresRelief!!!!

Welcome to VJ..


I know exactly how you feel. I stumbled across this forum only a couple of months ago. Before finding Visajourney.com i was a pathetic, poor miserable #######. I was like one armed 3 fingered man in a canoe up craps creek without paddle. All I had was a bowling pin for a paddle.

since June of 2005 id been looking for ANYTHING, anywhere, asking anyone about anything even remotely in connection with the visa process to find answers to some of the specific questions I had. I yielded nothing, basically. Everything I found was incredibly obvious and generic info. :whistle: :hehe: I did hundreds of differnt silly keyword searches on google and the info i gathered was contradictory and usless. Then one day somehow I stumbled upon Visajourney.com.

Here you can get everything from broad general information to incredibly specific details about any question on any form or document that you are dealing with.

Crikey there are entire threads devoted to just one questoin on the G-325!! Blimey!! Amazing! :dance: Its boggleworthy! Its downright flippidy doodaa......relax...relax....good forum though. (F) (F) (F) (F) (F) :yes:

:lol: :lol: :thumbs:
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 14:42:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresRelief!!!!
Welcome to VJ.......good to have you aboard :)

You are right, knowledge is power :thumbs: Lots of nooks and crannies in VJ that hold valuable information. I remember when I first started searching for info and posting a few questions on different sites. I went back six months later just out of curiousity and sure enough still no damm replies lol I was so glad when someone pointed me in the direction of VJ ....thanks again Mo :thumbs:

Lorelle
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 14:26:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresOh My GOSH!! Am I screwed?

Chances are good they'll automatically extend the validity through your interview date without any intervention on your part. You can call them to verify if it makes you feel more comfortable.

Best of luck on the interview!

I agree


What if my petition expires?

Consular officers have the authority to extend the validity of petitions that have expired. Because many petitions often expire before an applicant can be interviewed, officers at the Consulate routinely extend the validity of K-1 petitions

All the best for your interview

Lorelle

Edited by aussiewench, 29 May 2006 - 04:20 PM.

aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-29 16:19:00
K-1 Fiance(e) Visa Process & ProceduresWE GOT THE VISA!!!!!
That is AWESOME Denis.....YEEYAAAAAAAAA :dance: :dance:

Posted Image
aussiewenchFemaleAustralia2006-05-26 11:04:00