ForumTitleContentMemberSexCountryDate/Time
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Administrative Review/AP How are You Coping
You should contact other members to see what the current timeframe for ISL AP is. If my memory serves me right, it used to be around 6-8 months. No idea what it is currently.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-03-02 19:21:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Mandatory AP in New Delhi Consulate in India
That's great news. Congratulations! :)
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-06-09 10:14:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Mandatory AP in New Delhi Consulate in India
Hey, Conner--any updates to your case?
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-06-08 01:16:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)I WAS DENIED IN MOROCCO CONSULATE
You say you've been together since 2007 -- that's fine and dandy but how much time have you spent in person together?

Edited by sachinky, 28 March 2011 - 08:23 PM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-03-28 20:22:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Casablanca Morocco Interview
If there is a second interview, you NEED to be there.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-07-14 14:00:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)212 (a)(6)(c)(1)

yes.. I got my visitors B1/B2 visa in june 2009.. I went to US in july 2009 and stayed there for a month. I had gone there to see my brother..When officer returned my passport after interview i noticed that they have cancelled my visitors visa..I dnt knw y they have done that before issuing me a CR1 visa..


Once you have filed a I-130 you have established immigrant intent, thus, making your B-2 tourist visa null and void. All my previous visas were stamped "cancelled without prejudice" at the conclusion of my interview.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-03 09:08:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)212 (a)(6)(c)(1)

Sue them ? Tell them you have no care about religion or caste and none of it matters. Why is a religious marriage even needed? What if you are non religious?


Not having a religious wedding is not the issue. Lying about it, is, though. Plenty of visas, including mine, have been issued with only a civil ceremony.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-03 08:59:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)212 (a)(6)(c)(1)

Well, I know very little about India, but it seems the Full Legal Marriage Certificate "trumps" any doubts that the CO's could have about the validity of the Marriage..

I haven't got a clue why they would feel its invalid...

Anyone? Anyone?


Because in India, it's easy to get anything you need for the right price. Different religions and communities have different laws (Acts) under which they get married in India and the rules differ from each. Sometimes it's easy to bypass all the requirements (like a waiting period, serving a notice of intent) if you know the right person, who is willing to issue the marriage certificate for the right price. I know when I was getting married, people thought I was crazy for following all the rules to the T, but I did speak to a Indian lawyer who told me to do everything the right way since US immigration was going to be involved in it and that a marriage certificate's validity could be challenged in court if all the requirements had not been met prior to the marriage taking place.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-02 16:15:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)212 (a)(6)(c)(1)
What religion do you both belong to?

There's a lot of going on here and you can tell why the COs would be suspicious.

Did you or did you NOT have a religious wedding? Did your wife lie about having a religious wedding when in fact, you did not?

I had a civil wedding (that is, sign papers in front of the marriage registrar with the requisite three witnesses) and then we exchanged garlands and rings and that was that. All in our living room. No pheras around the fire. CR-1 was issued without any problems or questions.

You need an excellent immigration attorney as your wife has basically signed a paper saying she committed material misrepresentation.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-02 16:09:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)THE BIG DAY!!! Tomorrow is Hubby's Big DAy!!!
Many congratulations!
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-04 08:38:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)waiveri-601 denied!

They have stated that the drug conviction has no possible waiver ( meaning EVER) so that he is permanently denied coming. You have shown you can live there by doing so. I don't think there is much hope of ever getting a visa for him to enter the US unless immigration changes its attitude about drugs and guns


That pretty much says it all.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-15 20:41:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Oh my gosh! Somebody please help me!
Any admission of drug use during the medical or interview is sufficient reason to get a ban from US-entry. The rules may differ if the user was under 18 at the time of use, I can't be sure.

The second test was likely done to make sure that he was in fact telling the truth -- that he had used it four years ago and not smoked up the night before with his friends or is a habitual smoker.

The difference is that if he lied about and the second test, in fact, came back positive, he'd probably be hit with misrepresentation instead of a one year ban on entry.

This is what I'm thinking happened. Tested at interview, negative but admitted to using weed four years ago. Probably questioned at the embassy about prior drug use and tested again to confirm that he was saying the truth. Probably negative again but banned due to admission of drug use in the past.

Of course, we could just wait for an answer from the Embassy instead of speculating.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-08-14 12:14:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)How long is a CR-1 good for post inadmissibility finding?
The I-130 form itself -- as far as I know -- doesn't expire since it validates the relationship b/w USC petitioner and his/her immediate relative. I could be wrong, of course--hopefully someone else will come along and give you the information you need.

Edited by sachinky, 10 July 2011 - 07:40 PM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-07-10 19:39:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)How long is a CR-1 good for post inadmissibility finding?
You will need a strong waiver and an excellent attorney in order to get the charge of material misrepresentation overturned.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-07-10 16:10:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)221 G , New Delhi, Request for additional Documents
90-120 days seems to be the norm for a NWD AP.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2011-09-11 13:51:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Not sure if my parents need to file a waiver...please help...
It's going to be hard to prove extreme hardship since your father has lived in Mexico all his life (apart from his illegal presence in the US).
sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-02-04 20:13:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)LARGE AGE GAPS, PRIOR MARRIAGES NEED NOT APPLY

I personally feel it's not the COs business if my fiance hurt me down the line. That is something I should've figured out before applying for him. People see signs of a bad relationship and still pursuit so who's fault is that. It is the COs job to proof that my relationship with my man is real and not to tell rather or not he's bad or good for me. That's my opinion.



You have every right to be engaged or married to a class A d-bag. However, the US government also has the right to not allow the d-bag into the country to live on a permanent basis.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-03-15 13:09:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)LARGE AGE GAPS, PRIOR MARRIAGES NEED NOT APPLY

I think most males are pretty clear what the deal is if they import a younger spouse that would not otherwise give them the time of day.

I just wonder if the issue here is that women have different expectations?



Bingo. This is exactly what I said to my husband last night. Posted Image


sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-03-11 20:33:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)LARGE AGE GAPS, PRIOR MARRIAGES NEED NOT APPLY

D/D,

I agreed with your original post! There is definitely bias in the immigration process. Me and my husband have two areas on the so-called red flag list: Divorce / new marriage dates close, and we are different races. The result: we are still waiting for a NOA2 going on 14 months. We know our relationship is true, and we are praying each day.

When I hear cases on here when some poor USC has suffered fraud I get so angry because how can the fraudsters get through but me and my husband kept apart because of a bias system.


Looks like the petitioner was interviewed twice already. This does not seem to be a normal case. NOA2s shouldn't take 14 months. There's more to this story. Is your husband of French origin?
sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-03-09 21:49:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)LARGE AGE GAPS, PRIOR MARRIAGES NEED NOT APPLY

:thumbs: Hear Hear!! Totally agree with the above. And I also find it difficult to buy into the whole "not culturally normal" attitude. I get it, believe me. But I'm not trying to immigrate to my fiance's country, he's trying to immigrate to the US and cultures are different here. So why does our relationship have to follow what's culturally normal in his home country? I understand that family plays a part in every relationship, but we're not living with the family and if our families are in agreement anyways, why would couples be denied or at least be put into AP based on "not culturally normal"? Just my opinion.


Because chances are, without the green-card "sweetening the deal," -- so to speak -- the beneficiary would not be engaged to someone who looks like his grandmother, in all likelihood. I think the important question here is, if you take out the immigration factor, does this relationship still make sense?

I am going to quote JimVaPhuong here because he put it much more elegantly in another thread. The sentence in bold hits the nail on the head.

Age doesn't matter at some consulates, but it's a very big deal at some others. It depends very much on what would be considered socially acceptable in the beneficiary's country. In many cultures the primary purpose of marriage is to produce a family. In those cultures it would be unusual for a woman to enter a marriage if she was nearing the end of her child bearing years.

Also, in some cultures it's considered unusual for someone to marry outside of their race, religion, or social group. The couple might be subjected to persecution or ridicule.

Neither one of these is proof positive that the relationship is a sham, but they do cause a consular officer to wonder if the relationship would exist if immigration was not a factor. Would the beneficiary be as willing to break those cultural taboos if they were going to continue to live in that country? A consular officer ... would usually conclude that they would not, and they'd deny the visa.


Edited by sachinky, 09 March 2012 - 09:39 PM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-03-09 21:35:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)denial 212 a6c1
I am not too familiar with the misrep charge but this is my layman's understanding. This is just, IMO, but in this case the omission IS willful and material. Like momof1 pointed out, had you disclosed your previous marriage but simply didn't have your divorce papers, would you have been approved? I am guessing not. The difference between material misrepresentation and misrepresentation is that the fact that is in question must be central to the petitioner/applicant's case. Meaning, if the fact had been known to be a lie would a visa be issued? For example, if you state that you went to college when in fact you did not, you are misrepresenting a fact. However, while that is a lie, it is not a lie that is pertinent to your family-based visa. However, that very example could very well become a sticking point if you were applying for an employment visa or a student visa for post-grad studies.

Does that make sense? Anyway, you're in too deep to proceed without legal help. I hope you find a good lawyer.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-02-04 09:16:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)denial 212 a6c1

The sticking point with fraud is was the omission willful and was it material. Had she mentioned she was married but didn't have the appropriate divorce paperwork, would they have been approved? No. Therefore the omission becomes central to the petitioner and immigrant's application.


^This. Posted Image
sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-02-03 23:31:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)denial 212 a6c1
Who is this 'lady' you keep referring to? A lawyer? A friend? A neighbor?

Also, you can see why you got denied, right? I'm going to spell it out. Or rather, type in short sentences.

You were married to his brother. For three years. Didn't disclose it. Either to your current husband. Or the US government, for that matter. Both, VERY bad ideas. Interview day, husband discovers your previous marriage. To his brother. That he had no bleeping idea about. You want the immigration CO to believe this is a bona-fide marriage. REALLY?

You've made a grand old mess and unfortunately the USCIS doesn't look too kindly upon the "young, drunk and/or stupid" excuse. That said, I do wish you the best in reuniting with your husband. Good luck and keep us posted.

Edited by sachinky, 01 February 2012 - 08:42 PM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2012-02-01 20:41:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)K1 - 221(g) Help
Yaay for Shane!! :thumbs:
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-04-26 14:57:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)K1 - 221(g) Help
The I-134 often follows the the guidelines set for the I-864.

Only a USC/LPR can be a joint sponsor. Proof of their USC/LPR status must be provided.

It's usually helpful to follow the I864 guidelines when attempting to complete a I-134 as consulates often apply the same yardstick.

This is just my limited understanding of the I-134.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-04-22 08:30:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Should I do somthing now? would you help me here?
When did you submit the extra additional proof? Has the USC contacted their Senator or their elected representatives?
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-11-25 10:23:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Should I do somthing now? would you help me here?
Get married and file for CR-1?
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-11-20 12:01:00
Waivers (I-601 and I-212) and Administrative Processes (221g)Form I-601 For religious objection to vaccines

You have the right to religious freedom but immigration is not a right , it is a privilege and on this basis they are pretty hard nosed about the shots. If you don't want the shots then don't expect the privilege of immigrating. They are under the belief that the welfare of the US population out weighs your beliefs and so they will deny you the privilege of immigration. We have yet to hear anyone getting the waiver for vaccines. If he feels that strong about them , you will have to immigrate the other direction probably.


+1 :thumbs:
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-08-10 15:22:00
United KingdomSomewhat An Off-Topic Question
I think it's the quality/type of milk that makes the difference.

Frosty, I'd be happy to ship some over for you!
sachinkyFemaleIndia2009-11-15 17:44:00
United KingdomSomewhat An Off-Topic Question
Oh, Indian Cadbury triumphs ALL other Cadbury's including UK/USA. I take about a ton of chocolate bars everytime I go back to the US.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2009-11-14 13:37:00
United KingdomRant thread
I need to rant. About many, many things.

But mostly why won't USCIS tell us where we are in the process. It's not the separation -- which is bad enough -- that I can't handle, it's the NOT knowing. What's the harm in telling us "we're still processing your background checks?" or "Hey, it looks like it'll be through in two weeks."

Also, I'm tired of people judging others for getting married at a young age. I mean, what is that? Too young? Is there a particular age when one is suddenly equipped with the requisite emotional maturity to handle a lifelong commitment? Do you wake up one morning and decide, aah! I am finally old enough to be married! Marriage like everything else in life is a gamble, a risk or sorts. It has a 50/50 chance of working out. Whether you're 25 or 55. If I was 28 and wanted to get married to some guy I had known for a few months, I doubt I'd have to hear as many whispers as I did about getting married to a guy I've dated for nearly two years at 22.

I'm tired of reading snarky Facebook comments such as "Why are so many people I know getting engaged or married? Personally I think you should get a job first. Just saying."

Uh, personally, I think you shouldn't others for their lifestyle choices. You should focus on getting yourself a life first. And anyway, what does getting a job have to do with getting married or engaged? I wasn't aware that jobs were doled out according to marital or relationship status. Just saying.

Edited by sachinky, 14 December 2009 - 08:22 AM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2009-12-14 08:21:00
United KingdomIs the best option naturalization? Duel Citizen? Permanent Resident?
The U.S. doesn't forbid dual citizenship but doesn't recognize it either. Meaning, for the U.S. government you'll be only a USC, no matter what your other citizenship is. But by becoming a USC, you don't automatically renounce your former citizenship, unless that country revokes citizenship if the citizen takes up citizenship of another country.

Anyway, this is what I understand.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-01-05 14:16:00
United KingdomLosing patience
Give it another week. You're almost done.
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-01-22 13:48:00
United KingdomCoping with the move from the UK to the US
CHEEZ-ITS. AND CHEESYPUFFS. OMG.

Edited by sachinky, 28 January 2010 - 11:49 AM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-01-28 11:48:00
United KingdomGot IT!!!
Wonderful news--congratulations. :)
sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-02-19 12:18:00
United Kingdomuk citizin married to brasilian in brazil! whant to move to the uk! but desparate for advice if anyone can help
Uh--What does any of this have to do with U.S. immigration?
sachinkyFemaleIndia2009-12-22 03:33:00
United KingdomUS Bank will not send fiancee a letter for the I-134
Why do you need a letter from the bank ? Why not just print the online statements off your bank's website?

Far less hassle.

Edited by sachinky, 18 April 2010 - 05:13 AM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-04-18 05:13:00
United KingdomNaturalization wobbles
Honestly, if you have 'doubts' or 'wobbles' -- you probably aren't ready to take up another country's citizenship and make that 'commitment.'

You will know whether 'batting for the other team; is the 'right decision' for you (based on whatever your reasoning is -- practical, emotional, political) instead of trying to get strangers on internet forums to convince you, one way or another.

Edited by sachinky, 17 June 2010 - 02:52 PM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-06-17 14:51:00
United KingdomNaturalization wobbles

It's interesting that Americans are prepared to slag off their government with the most appalling epithets, but somehow the flag and the country is a mystical concept and nothing to do with, and totally separate from, the government


This is actually something I *totally* get. I disagree with the Indian government, am apalled at some of their policies, at the rampant corruption. But to me, my country and flag is sacred. My soil is sacred. I don't see it as having any connection to the current government in power which will change in five short years. Those are two very separate things.

Edited by sachinky, 16 June 2010 - 02:54 PM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-06-16 14:52:00
United KingdomNaturalization wobbles
Do you know why naturalized citizens are ineligible to run for POTUS? Primarily, because of what Bob mentioned. Sounds a bit 'loony' but it's not. It is assumed that naturalized citizens do NOT feel the same allegiance towards the U.S. as a natural-born does and this becomes even more troubling in times of war. A naturalized USC (born in, say, Britain) POTUS isn't going to feel comfortable with the idea of bombing his hometown where he grew up, where he went to school. Where his sister and her family lives. It's why only natural born citizens are eligible to become POTUS. So that there is no troubling issue of 'dual allegiance' then. And no, this is not 'my opinion' -- this is political philosophy, and you can read it in a book written by smart people.

For me, these are the reasons I'd consider becoming a USC:

--Never have to deal with USCIS again. Seriously, who'd want to?
--Not have to worry about 'maintaining residency.' We'd love to live in India together for a few years and I want to be able to come and go as I like.
--Of course, this would only happen when India allows dual citizenship. I don't want to surrender my Indian passport--it's an irrational, sentimental reason and I can't explain it.

But that's precisely the reason. I love the U.S., I enjoy my time here. I love living here with my husband. I have a great many friends here who I consider very close. But I don't feel a strong, sentimental, unexplainable attachment to the U.S. as I do with India.

Just my two cents.

Hope you're able to make the 'right' decision -- whatever that may be for you!

Edited by sachinky, 13 June 2010 - 11:04 AM.

sachinkyFemaleIndia2010-06-13 11:02:00